• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

责任考虑因素与医疗政策设计:对挪威人口的调查研究。

Responsibility Considerations and the Design of Health Care Policies: A Survey Study of the Norwegian Population.

机构信息

Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Comparative Politics, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):115-138. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8
PMID:33249548
Abstract

The objective of this article is to explore people's attitudes toward responsibility in the allocation of public health care resources. Special attention is paid to conceptualizations of responsibility involving blame and sanctions. A representative sample of the Norwegian population was asked about various responsibility mechanisms that have been proposed in the theoretical literature on health care and personal responsibility, from denial of treatment to a tax on unhealthy consumer goods. Survey experiments were employed to study treatment effects, such as whether fairness considerations affect attitudes about responsibility. We find that, overall, a substantial minority of the respondents find it fair to let the health care system sanction people-in one way or another-for voluntary behaviors that increase the risk of becoming ill. Quite surprisingly, we find that people are more prone to report that they should themselves be held responsible for unhealthy lifestyles than others.

摘要

本文旨在探讨人们对公共卫生保健资源分配中责任的态度。特别关注涉及责备和制裁的责任概念化。我们向挪威代表性人口样本询问了各种责任机制,这些机制在医疗保健和个人责任的理论文献中都有提出,从拒绝治疗到对不健康的消费品征税。我们采用调查实验来研究治疗效果,例如公平考虑是否会影响对责任的态度。我们发现,总体而言,相当一部分受访者认为让医疗系统以某种方式制裁那些会增加患病风险的自愿行为的人是公平的。令人惊讶的是,我们发现人们更倾向于认为自己应该对不健康的生活方式负责,而不是其他人。

相似文献

1
Responsibility Considerations and the Design of Health Care Policies: A Survey Study of the Norwegian Population.责任考虑因素与医疗政策设计:对挪威人口的调查研究。
HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):115-138. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
2
Phase-dependent justification: the role of personal responsibility in fair healthcare.阶段依赖性辩护:个人责任在公平医疗保健中的作用。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Oct;41(10):836-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102645. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
3
Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents.优先事项设定和个人健康责任:对挪威主要政策文件的分析。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105612. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
Personal responsibility within health policy: unethical and ineffective.个人在卫生政策中的责任:不道德且无效。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):53-58. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103478. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
5
Should Lifestyles Be a Criterion for Healthcare Rationing? Evidence from a Portuguese Survey.生活方式应成为医疗资源分配的标准吗?来自葡萄牙一项调查的证据。
J Res Health Sci. 2017 Nov 18;17(4):e00399.
6
On the Anatomy of Health-related Actions for Which People Could Reasonably be Held Responsible: A Framework.论人们可被合理追究责任的健康相关行为的解剖:一个框架。
J Med Philos. 2023 Jun 20;48(4):384-399. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad025.
7
[Personal responsibility -- a criterion for allocation in health care?].[个人责任——医疗保健资源分配的一个标准?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005 Jun 17;130(24):1512-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870849.
8
Personal responsibility in oral health: ethical considerations.口腔健康中的个人责任:伦理考量
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012 Nov 30;30 Suppl 1:12-20.
9
Responsibility as an Obstacle to Good Policy: The Case of Lifestyle Related Disease.责任成为良策的阻碍:以生活方式相关疾病为例
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):459-468. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9860-y. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
[Who is the guardian of our own health? Individual and social responsibility for health].[谁是我们自身健康的守护者?个人与社会对健康的责任]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Oct;88(5):569-80. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000500003.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of individual health responsibility: A context-base concept.个体健康责任的范围综述:一个基于背景的概念。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 5;13:167. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_23. eCollection 2024.