• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体健康责任的范围综述:一个基于背景的概念。

A scoping review of individual health responsibility: A context-base concept.

作者信息

Hosseini Nodeh Zahra, Hosseini Mohammadali, Fallahi Khoshknab Masoud, Shirozhan Shima, Khankeh Hamid Reza

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 5;13:167. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_23. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_23
PMID:39268457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11392281/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individual health responsibility plays an important role in maintaining and improving people's health. There are controversial opinions related to this concept. This study aimed to investigate controversial opinions related to individual health responsibility and familiarize researchers and policy makers with the available evidence and gap of knowledge in the recent years.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This paper is a scoping review. The five-step approach of Arksey and O'Malley was used to review the relevant literature from the beginning of 2017 to the end of 2022. The search was done in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, web of sciences, Cochrane databases, and Google Scholar search engine using the English keywords "health responsibility" AND "individual" OR "personal".

RESULTS

All articles and theses related to individual health responsibility, which were in English and had access to their full text, were included in the study. After a 2-stage screening for 1,412 articles and theses, 32 were included in the study. The findings indicated that most of the studies were conducted in developed European continent. The published articles included a wide range of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research, and acute and chronic diseases have been considered in this field.

CONCLUSION

Individual health responsibility is a multidimensional concept that is influenced by individual, social, and cultural factors, and emphasizing it can have both positive and negative effects on people's health. To the concept be effective in health promotion, it is important to pay attention to individual and social context, health status, and community and health policy makers views about individual health responsibility.

摘要

背景

个人健康责任在维护和改善人们的健康方面发挥着重要作用。关于这一概念存在争议性观点。本研究旨在调查与个人健康责任相关的争议性观点,并使研究人员和政策制定者熟悉近年来现有的证据和知识差距。

材料与方法

本文是一项范围综述。采用阿克西和奥马利的五步方法对2017年初至2022年底的相关文献进行综述。使用英文关键词“健康责任”以及“个人”或“个体”在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、科学网、Cochrane数据库和谷歌学术搜索引擎中进行检索。

结果

所有与个人健康责任相关、英文撰写且可获取全文的文章和论文均纳入本研究。经过对1412篇文章和论文的两阶段筛选,32篇被纳入研究。研究结果表明,大多数研究在欧洲发达地区进行。已发表的文章包括广泛的定量、定性和混合研究,并且该领域已考虑到急性和慢性疾病。

结论

个人健康责任是一个多维概念,受到个人、社会和文化因素的影响,强调它可能对人们的健康产生积极和消极影响。为使这一概念在健康促进中有效,关注个人和社会背景、健康状况以及社区和健康政策制定者对个人健康责任的看法很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f165/11392281/3e3f24ff2459/JEHP-13-167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f165/11392281/3e3f24ff2459/JEHP-13-167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f165/11392281/3e3f24ff2459/JEHP-13-167-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A scoping review of individual health responsibility: A context-base concept.个体健康责任的范围综述:一个基于背景的概念。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 5;13:167. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_565_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review.加拿大原住民社区对残疾的看法:一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 10;14:e57590. doi: 10.2196/57590.
6
Researchers' experiences with patient engagement in health research: a scoping review and thematic synthesis.研究人员在健康研究中患者参与方面的经验:一项范围综述与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 10;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00431-8.
7
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Knowledge-seeking and knowledge sharing of health services across social networks and communities: a scoping review.跨社会网络和社区的卫生服务知识寻求与知识共享:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12525-y.
9
Using social marketing for the promotion of cognitive health: a scoping review protocol.运用社会营销推广认知健康:系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 13;11(10):e049947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049947.
10
Analyzing the Perspectives of Health Professionals and Legal Cannabis Users on the Treatment of Chronic Pain With Cannabidiol: Protocol for a Scoping Review.分析健康专业人员和合法大麻使用者对大麻二酚治疗慢性疼痛的看法:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 20;12:e37697. doi: 10.2196/37697.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between cognitive function and vascular health in office-based sedentary workers: A six-month yoga intervention.办公室久坐员工认知功能与血管健康之间的关联:一项为期六个月的瑜伽干预研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jul 31;14:278. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1442_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of a six-month yoga intervention on vascular parameters in sedentary office workers: An interrupted time-series study design.为期六个月的瑜伽干预对久坐办公室职员血管参数的影响:一项中断时间序列研究设计
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 May 30;14:202. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1154_24. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Responsibility Frames and Their Effects in the Health Context.健康领域责任框架及其影响的系统评价
J Health Commun. 2021 Dec 2;26(12):828-838. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.2020381. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
2
Health-Promoting Lifestyle in Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study on the Experiences and Perspectives of Colorectal Cancer Survivors and Healthcare Providers.结直肠癌幸存者的健康促进生活方式:一项关于结直肠癌幸存者及医护人员经历与观点的定性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct 4;8(6):696-710. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon-2132. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
3
Personal responsibility for health? A phenomenographic analysis of general practitioners' conceptions.
个人对健康的责任?对全科医生观念的现象学分析。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Sep;39(3):322-331. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1935048. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
COVID-19 information on social media and preventive behaviors: Managing the pandemic through personal responsibility.社交媒体上的新冠疫情信息与预防行为:通过个人责任应对疫情
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113928. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113928. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
Processes of a Transformation of Young Drivers' Responsibility for Health-.年轻驾驶员健康责任的转变过程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073634.
6
Responsibility Considerations and the Design of Health Care Policies: A Survey Study of the Norwegian Population.责任考虑因素与医疗政策设计:对挪威人口的调查研究。
HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):115-138. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09430-8. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
7
The Mismarriage of Personal Responsibility and Health.个人责任与健康的错配
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Apr;29(2):196-204. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000999.
8
The Undeserving Sick? An Evaluation of Patients' Responsibility for Their Health Condition.不值得同情的病人?对患者对自身健康状况责任的评估。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Apr;29(2):175-191. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000975.
9
Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents.优先事项设定和个人健康责任:对挪威主要政策文件的分析。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):39-45. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105612. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
10
Health in the United States: Are Appeals to Choice and Personal Responsibility Making Americans Sick?美国的健康状况:对选择和个人责任的呼吁是否使美国人患病?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):643-664. doi: 10.1177/1745691619896252. Epub 2020 Feb 25.