• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大口径抽吸导管行机械血栓切除术治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的效果:与支架取栓系统的比较。

Effect of manual aspiration thrombectomy using large-bore aspiration catheter for acute basilar artery occlusion: comparison with a stent retriever system.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-02013-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-020-02013-7
PMID:33250061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7702718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A large-bore aspiration catheter can be employed for recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion. Here we compare the results of mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever (SR) and manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) using a large-bore aspiration catheter system as a first-line recanalization method in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO).

METHODS

The records of 50 patients with acute BAO who underwent mechanical thrombectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the first-line recanalization method. The treatment and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Sixteen (32%) patients were treated with MAT with a large-bore aspiration catheter and 34 (68%) with a SR as the first-line treatment method. The MAT group had a shorter procedure time (28 vs. 65 min; p = 0.001), higher rate of first-pass recanalization (68.8% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.044), and lower median number of passes (1 vs 2; p = 0.008) when compared with the SR group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of any hemorrhagic complication (6.3% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.754) between the groups. However, there were four cases of procedure-related subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in the SR group and one death occurred due to massive hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of MAT using a large-bore aspiration catheter for acute BAO may be a safe and effective first-line treatment method with higher first-pass recanalization rate and shorter procedure time than SR.

摘要

背景

大口径抽吸导管可用于急性基底动脉闭塞再通。在此,我们比较了支架取栓术(SR)和手动抽吸血栓切除术(MAT)在急性基底动脉闭塞(BAO)作为一线再通方法中的效果,其中 MAT 采用大口径抽吸导管系统。

方法

回顾性分析了 50 例接受机械血栓切除术的急性 BAO 患者的记录。根据一线再通方法将患者分为两组。比较治疗和临床结局。

结果

16 例(32%)患者采用大口径抽吸导管进行 MAT 治疗,34 例(68%)患者采用 SR 作为一线治疗方法。MAT 组的手术时间更短(28 分钟 vs. 65 分钟;p=0.001),首次通过再通率更高(68.8% vs. 38.2%,p=0.044),通过次数中位数更低(1 次 vs. 2 次;p=0.008),与 SR 组相比。两组的任何出血性并发症发生率(6.3% vs. 8.8%;p=0.754)均无显著差异。然而,SR 组有 4 例与手术相关的蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH),1 例因大量出血而死亡。

结论

对于急性 BAO,选择大口径抽吸导管进行 MAT 可能是一种安全有效的一线治疗方法,其首次通过再通率更高,手术时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34d/7702718/7994e770971f/12883_2020_2013_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34d/7702718/f6d8be0366b8/12883_2020_2013_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34d/7702718/7994e770971f/12883_2020_2013_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34d/7702718/f6d8be0366b8/12883_2020_2013_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f34d/7702718/7994e770971f/12883_2020_2013_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of manual aspiration thrombectomy using large-bore aspiration catheter for acute basilar artery occlusion: comparison with a stent retriever system.使用大口径抽吸导管行机械血栓切除术治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的效果:与支架取栓系统的比较。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-02013-7.
2
Comparison of effectiveness and outcomes among different thrombectomy techniques in acute basilar artery occlusion: a dual-center experience.不同机械取栓技术治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的有效性和结局比较:一项双中心经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Jul;51(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2021.4.FOCUS21114.
3
Mechanical thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: influence of reperfusion on clinical outcome and impact of the first-line strategy (ADAPT vs stent retriever).基底动脉闭塞机械取栓:再通对临床结局的影响以及一线策略(ADAPT 与支架取栓)的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1482-1491. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS171043. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
Predictors for Mortality after Mechanical Thrombectomy of Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion.急性基底动脉闭塞机械取栓术后死亡的预测因素
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(1-2):61-67. doi: 10.1159/000486690. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
5
Efficacy and safety of direct aspiration first pass technique versus stent-retriever thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion-a retrospective single center experience.直接抽吸首次通过技术与支架取栓术治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的疗效和安全性——一项单中心回顾性研究经验
Neuroradiology. 2017 Mar;59(3):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1802-6. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
Firstline a direct aspiration first pass technique versus firstline stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接抽吸与直接支架取栓治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的一线治疗技术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Aug;11(8):740-746. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014573. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line stent retriever versus direct aspiration.急性基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:支架取栓与直接抽吸作为一线治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2023 Aug;13(8):e3141. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3141. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
Double Stent Retriever (SR) Technique: A Novel Mechanical Thrombectomy Technique to Facilitate the Device-Clot Interaction for Refractory Acute Cerebral Large Vessel Occlusions.双支架取栓器(SR)技术:一种新型机械取栓技术,可促进装置-血栓相互作用,改善急性大脑大血管闭塞的难治性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.268. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
The ANTRACK Technique: Employing a Compliant Balloon or Stent Retriever to Advance a Large-Bore Catheter to an Occlusion During Thrombectomy Procedures in Acute Stroke Patients.ANTRACK 技术:在急性脑卒中患者取栓术中,采用顺应性球囊或支架取栓器将大口径导管推进至闭塞部位。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Jun 1;16(6):692-699. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy202.
10
Comparison of Solitaire thrombectomy and Penumbra suction thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion.Solitaire取栓术与Penumbra抽吸取栓术治疗基底动脉闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中患者的比较
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):13-8. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011472. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing efficacy and safety of direct aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直接抽吸与支架取栓术治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuroradiol J. 2025 Aug 25:19714009251371266. doi: 10.1177/19714009251371266.
2
Comparison of Aspiration and Stent Retriever in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Subanalysis of the K-NET Registry.急性基底动脉闭塞中抽吸术与取栓支架的比较:K-NET注册研究的亚分析
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2025-0067. Epub 2025 Aug 15.
3
CILO-CLOP Trial: Cilostazol Versus Clopidogrel in Acute Moderate and Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct thromboaspiration efficacy for mechanical thrombectomy is related to the angle of interaction between the aspiration catheter and the clot.直接血栓抽吸在机械取栓中的效果与抽吸导管与血栓之间的相互作用角度有关。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):396-400. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015113. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
2
Rapid Successful Reperfusion of Basilar Artery Occlusion Strokes With Pretreatment Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Posterior-Circulation ASPECTS <8 Is Associated With Good Outcome.预处理弥散加权成像后循环 ASPECTS <8 与基底动脉闭塞性卒中的快速再通成功相关,与良好结局相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e010962. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010962.
3
西洛他唑与氯吡格雷治疗急性中度及中重度缺血性卒中的随机对照多中心试验:CILO-CLOP试验
Neurol Ther. 2025 Jun;14(3):927-948. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00739-5. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
4
Successful mechanical thrombectomy with an aspiration catheter for fenestrated basilar artery occlusion guided by preoperative basi-parallel anatomical scanning.在术前基底平行解剖扫描引导下,使用抽吸导管成功进行机械取栓治疗开窗型基底动脉闭塞。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Sep 19;19(12):6039-6046. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.09.044. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)和欧洲微创神经治疗学会(ESMINT)急性基底动脉闭塞管理指南。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Aug 14;16(9):e7. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022053.
6
Aspiration only versus stent retriever only thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: a propensity score-matched analysis of the German Stroke Registry.基底动脉闭塞中单纯抽吸术与单纯支架取栓术的比较:德国卒中登记处的倾向评分匹配分析
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 1;17(e2):e393-e399. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021797.
7
European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy guideline on acute management of basilar artery occlusion.欧洲卒中组织和欧洲微创神经治疗学会急性基底动脉闭塞管理指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):835-884. doi: 10.1177/23969873241257223. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Network meta-analysis of first-line thrombectomy strategy for acute posterior circulation strokes: a preliminary evaluation for combined approach.急性后循环卒中一线取栓策略的网状Meta分析:联合治疗方法的初步评估
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1279233. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1279233. eCollection 2023.
9
3D T2-Weighted Sampling Perfection with Application-Optimized Contrasts Using Different Flip Angle Evolutions (SPACE) and 3D Time-of-Flight (TOF) MR Angiography Fusion Imaging for Occluded Intracranial Arteries.使用不同翻转角演变的应用优化对比度的3D T2加权采样完美序列(SPACE)和3D时间飞跃(TOF)磁共振血管造影融合成像用于颅内动脉闭塞
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(9):452-457. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2021-0102. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line stent retriever versus direct aspiration.急性基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗:支架取栓与直接抽吸作为一线治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2023 Aug;13(8):e3141. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3141. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial.
抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术作为血管内治疗大动脉闭塞(COMPASS)的一线治疗方法:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、盲法结局、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.
4
Further Development of Combined Techniques Using Stent Retrievers, Aspiration Catheters and BGC : The PROTECT Technique.进一步发展支架取栓器、抽吸导管和 BGC 联合技术:PROTECT 技术。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;30(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0742-9. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy.ADAPT FAST 研究:急性脑卒中取栓的直接抽吸首过技术。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jul;10(Suppl 1):i4-i7. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011125.rep.
6
First Pass Effect: A New Measure for Stroke Thrombectomy Devices.初次通过效应:一种新的用于脑卒中取栓装置的测量方法。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):660-666. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020315. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内接触抽吸与支架取栓术对急性缺血性卒中合并大血管闭塞患者血管再通的影响:ASTER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9644.
8
Maximizing First-Pass Complete Reperfusion with SAVE.利用SAVE实现首次通过完全再灌注最大化。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;28(3):327-338. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0566-z. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
Continuous aspiration prior to intracranial vascular embolectomy (CAPTIVE): a technique which improves outcomes.在颅内血管取栓术(CAPTIVE)之前进行持续抽吸:一种改善预后的技术。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1154-1159. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012838. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
10
Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB stent for treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: A single-center experience.Solitaire AB 支架机械取栓治疗急性基底动脉闭塞:单中心经验。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Oct;32:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Jun 13.