Abdel Raheem Ali, Alowidah Ibrahim, Soliman Mohamed, Haresy Mefarrih, Almozeni Ali, Althagafi Sultan, Almousa Mohamed, Alturki Mohamed
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Department of Urology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Afr J Urol. 2020;26(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12301-020-00085-y. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems and limited access to surgical care. Urolithiasis can lead to emergencies and affect renal function during long-term follow-up. Therefore, timely and appropriate treatment is essential.
This is a non-systematic review of the recently published recommendations regarding urolithiasis treatment options during COVID-19. Fourteen publications were the basis of our review. Regarding anesthesia methods, the optimal methods are still unknown. During COVID-19, most of the endo-urologists changed their routine clinical practice and elective surgical treatment approaches. Despite decreasing number of emergency visits and admissions for stone disease, patients tend to have leukocytosis, higher creatinine levels, increased grade 3 and 4 hydronephrosis, and higher incidence of complications compared to non-COVID-19 time. Several alarming indications if present, intervention should be performed within 24 h to prevent irreversible kidney damage, disease progression, or even death. Some endo-urologists prefer definitive stone treatment over temporarily drainage to reduce the number of emergency room visits and hospital admissions, except if infection is present or staged treatment is planned. Several clinical scenarios of non-emergency and non-urgent urinary stones are present; thus, endo-urologists should appropriately weigh patient's risk and surgery benefit to decide to the proper intervention time. If risks outweighed benefits to the patient, postpone the surgery. Renal colic should be managed with medical expulsive therapy and proper pain control with close follow-up just in case it becomes an emergency. Indwelling JJ stent removal or exchange is a matter of debate; some endo-urologists recommend removing, while others recommend postponing.
Treatment options for urinary stones have markedly changed during COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal anesthesia methods are still unknown. Emergency intervention is a must if any alarming indications exist. Emergency cases tend to have higher incidence of complications compared to non-COVID-19 time. For non-emergency and non-urgent urolithiasis, endo-urologists should make judicious treatment decision to prioritize urolithiasis treatment, and they should weigh benefits and risks before surgery.
新冠疫情使医疗系统不堪重负,限制了手术治疗的可及性。尿石症可导致急症,并在长期随访中影响肾功能。因此,及时且恰当的治疗至关重要。
这是一项对近期发表的关于新冠疫情期间尿石症治疗方案建议的非系统性综述。我们的综述以14篇出版物为基础。关于麻醉方法,最佳方法仍不明确。在新冠疫情期间,大多数腔内泌尿外科医生改变了他们的常规临床实践和择期手术治疗方法。尽管结石病的急诊就诊和住院人数减少,但与非新冠疫情时期相比,患者往往出现白细胞增多、肌酐水平升高、3级和4级肾积水增加以及并发症发生率更高的情况。如果出现一些警示指征,应在24小时内进行干预,以防止不可逆转的肾损伤、疾病进展甚至死亡。一些腔内泌尿外科医生更倾向于进行确定性结石治疗而非临时引流,以减少急诊室就诊和住院人数,除非存在感染或计划进行分期治疗。存在几种非急诊和非紧急尿路结石的临床情况;因此,腔内泌尿外科医生应适当权衡患者的风险和手术益处,以决定合适的干预时间。如果对患者而言风险大于益处,则推迟手术。肾绞痛应采用药物排石治疗和适当的疼痛控制,并密切随访以防其转变为急症。留置双J管的取出或更换存在争议;一些腔内泌尿外科医生建议取出,而另一些则建议推迟。
在新冠疫情期间,尿路结石的治疗方案发生了显著变化。最佳麻醉方法仍不明确。如果存在任何警示指征,必须进行紧急干预。与非新冠疫情时期相比,急诊病例的并发症发生率往往更高。对于非急诊和非紧急尿石症,腔内泌尿外科医生应做出明智的治疗决策,优先考虑尿石症治疗,并在手术前权衡益处和风险。