• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间肾结石治疗的中断:一项回顾性单中心研究

Disruptions in Renal Stone Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Militaru Adrian, Bulai Catalin Andrei, Multescu Razvan Dragos, Ene Cosmin Victor, Ene Mihai Andrei, Mares Cristian, Balacescu Stefan, Georgescu Dragos Adrian, Geavlete Petrisor Aurelian, Geavlete Bogdan Florin

机构信息

"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Urology, "Saint John" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):243-249. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243.

DOI:10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243
PMID:40880703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12347054/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated changes in renal stone management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a single center, focusing on treatment methods, patient outcomes and healthcare delivery models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing patients treated for kidney stones between July-September 2019 (pre-pandemic period) and July-September 2020 (pandemic period). We assessed the number of treated patients, treatment modalities and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 77 inpatients were analyzed, of whom 50 had been admitted to hospital during the pre-pandemic period and 27 during the pandemic, which represented a 46% decrease in hospitalizations. There were no significant differences in body mass index, average age, stone laterality, size, or location. Serum creatinine levels and positive urine cultures were also comparable between the groups. A trend toward more minimally invasive procedures was observed during the pandemic, with an increased use of flexible ureteroscopy (62% vs . 70.4%) and a decrease in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (12% vs . 7.4%). Operative times and hospital stays were similar across groups. However, the stone-free rate significantly decreased during the pandemic (91.1% vs . 84.07%).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted renal stone management, leading to a preference for minimally invasive surgery but a lower stone-free rate.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了单一中心在新冠疫情期间肾结石治疗的变化,重点关注治疗方法、患者预后和医疗服务提供模式。

材料与方法

我们进行了一项回顾性分析,比较了2019年7月至9月(疫情前时期)和2020年7月至9月(疫情时期)接受肾结石治疗的患者。我们评估了治疗患者的数量、治疗方式和术后结果。

结果

共分析了77例住院患者,其中50例在疫情前时期入院,27例在疫情期间入院,住院人数减少了46%。体重指数、平均年龄、结石侧别、大小或位置无显著差异。两组间血清肌酐水平和尿培养阳性结果也具有可比性。疫情期间观察到更多采用微创手术的趋势,输尿管软镜使用率增加(62%对70.4%),经皮肾镜取石术使用率降低(12%对7.4%)。各组的手术时间和住院时间相似。然而,疫情期间结石清除率显著降低(91.1%对84.07%)。

结论

新冠疫情严重扰乱了肾结石的治疗,导致倾向于微创手术,但结石清除率较低。

相似文献

1
Disruptions in Renal Stone Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Retrospective Single-Center Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间肾结石治疗的中断:一项回顾性单中心研究
Maedica (Bucur). 2025 Jun;20(2):243-249. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.243.
2
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
3
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole stones: the PUrE RCTs.经皮肾镜取石术、软性输尿管肾镜检查和体外冲击波碎石术治疗下极结石的临床疗效及成本效益:PUrE随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(40):1-186. doi: 10.3310/WFRE6844.
4
Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.氨甲环酸在经皮肾镜碎石术中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 26;10(10):CD015122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015122.pub2.
5
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
7
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
8
Service Interruption in HIV Care Amid COVID-19 Pandemic in Myanmar: Results From Analysis of Routine Program Data 2018-2022.缅甸新冠疫情期间艾滋病护理服务中断情况:2018 - 2022年常规项目数据分析结果
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:23259582241299466. doi: 10.1177/23259582241299466.
9
Comparison of Treatment Outcomes for Fluoroscopic and Fluoroscopy-free Endourological Procedures: A Systematic Review on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel.比较有创和无创腔内泌尿外科手术治疗效果的系统评价:代表欧洲泌尿外科学会结石诊疗指南专家组
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):938-953. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 outbreak impact on urolithiasis treatments: A multicenter retrospective study across 9 urological centers in Italy.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对尿石症治疗的影响:一项针对意大利9个泌尿外科中心的多中心回顾性研究。
Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):301-306. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000246. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
2
Urological Guidelines for Kidney Stones: Overview and Comprehensive Update.肾结石的泌尿外科指南:概述与全面更新
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 16;13(4):1114. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041114.
3
Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Restrict Access to Emergency Urological Services: Assessment of Reorganisation Effectiveness for Hospital Treatment.新冠肺炎疫情是否限制了紧急泌尿外科服务的获取:对医院治疗的组织调整效果评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;20(4):3735. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043735.
4
Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2-4 cm.逆行软性输尿管镜与经皮肾镜取石术治疗 2-4cm 肾结石的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 8;59(1):124. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010124.
5
Lessons learned after the disruption caused by COVID-19 in the management of urolithiasis: An example of adaptation in a high-volume center.新冠肺炎疫情对尿石症管理造成干扰后的经验教训:大容量中心的适应范例。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Apr;47(3):149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
6
Impact of COVID-19 on the management and outcomes of ureteric stones in the UK: a multicentre retrospective study.新冠疫情对英国输尿管结石诊治和结局的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BJU Int. 2023 Jan;131(1):82-89. doi: 10.1111/bju.15882. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with obstructing urinary stones complicated by infection.2019冠状病毒病大流行对合并感染的梗阻性尿路结石患者的影响。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Mar 13;3(4):298-303. doi: 10.1002/bco2.145. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
The development and application of a triage system for urolithiasis during COVID-19.COVID-19 期间尿路结石分诊系统的开发与应用。
World J Urol. 2022 Feb;40(2):577-583. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03871-7. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
COVID-19: The impact on urolithiasis treatment in Brazil.COVID-19:对巴西尿石症治疗的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jan-Feb;48(1):101-109. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0405.
10
An Italian multicenter analysis of emergency admissions and treatment of upper tract urolithiasis during the lockdown and reopening phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: Are we ready for a second wave of the outbreak?意大利多中心分析 COVID-19 大流行封锁和重新开放阶段的上尿路结石急症入院和治疗情况:我们是否已为疫情的第二次爆发做好准备?
Int J Urol. 2021 Sep;28(9):950-954. doi: 10.1111/iju.14612. Epub 2021 Jun 22.