Strebel Hendrik, Haller Bernhard, Sohn Maximilian, Schepp Wolfgang, Gundling Felix
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department for Internal Medicine I, Elblandklinikum, Meißen, Germany.
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;27(6):391-403. doi: 10.1159/000507225. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), in the context of liver cirrhosis, seems to result from low-grade cerebral edema of the astrocytes. Serum brain biomarkers S-100-beta und neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are often elevated in brain injury. We hypothesized that neuromarkers S-100-beta and NSE can be used in the diagnosis of HE, compared with standardized diagnostic tools.
A prospective non-randomized intervention study was performed using L-ornithine-L-aspartate (LOLA) for HE treatment. Primary endpoint was the evaluation of neuromarkers S-100-beta and NSE for detection and diagnosis of follow-up of HE. As secondary endpoints, the efficacy of LOLA on the course of HE and the diagnostic role of Portosystemic-Encephalopathy-Syndrome score (PHES) and critical flicker frequency (CFF) were analyzed. For diagnosis of covert (CHE) and overt (OHE) HE, West-Haven criteria (WHC), PHES and CFF were assessed at study entry. LOLA was applied (20 g i.v.) for 6 days. At the end of the study, HE evaluation was repeated. S-100-beta, NSE and ammonia were assessed in each patient before, during and after therapy with LOLA.
30 patients were included. At study entry, CHE was diagnosed in 50% and OHE in 50% of all subjects. A total of 25 participants completed the study. After LOLA therapy, deterioration of HE occurred in <11%, while most patients showed improvement (e.g. improved CFF in 79%). No significant correlation with HE severity (as diagnosed by WHC, PHES and CFF) could be demonstrated for any biochemical parameter. In addition, there were no significant changes in brain biomarkers during the treatment period.
While CFF as well as PHES showed good correlation with treatment response, S-100-beta and NSE did not significantly correlate with HE severity compared to proven diagnostic methods, and do not seem reliable biochemical markers for the follow-up under therapy.
在肝硬化背景下,肝性脑病(HE)似乎是由星形胶质细胞的轻度脑水肿引起的。血清脑生物标志物S-100-β和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在脑损伤时通常会升高。我们假设,与标准化诊断工具相比,神经标志物S-100-β和NSE可用于HE的诊断。
进行了一项前瞻性非随机干预研究,使用L-鸟氨酸-L-天冬氨酸(LOLA)治疗HE。主要终点是评估神经标志物S-100-β和NSE用于检测和诊断HE的随访情况。作为次要终点,分析了LOLA对HE病程的疗效以及门体性脑病综合征评分(PHES)和临界闪烁频率(CFF)的诊断作用。为了诊断隐匿性(CHE)和显性(OHE)HE,在研究开始时评估了韦斯特-黑文标准(WHC)、PHES和CFF。应用LOLA(静脉注射20 g),持续6天。在研究结束时,重复进行HE评估。在使用LOLA治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后,对每位患者进行S-100-β、NSE和氨的评估。
纳入30例患者。在研究开始时,所有受试者中50%被诊断为CHE,50%被诊断为OHE。共有25名参与者完成了研究。在LOLA治疗后,<11%的患者HE病情恶化,而大多数患者病情改善(例如,79%的患者CFF改善)。对于任何生化参数,均未显示与HE严重程度(根据WHC、PHES和CFF诊断)有显著相关性。此外,在治疗期间脑生物标志物无显著变化。
虽然CFF以及PHES与治疗反应显示出良好的相关性,但与已证实的诊断方法相比,S-100-β和NSE与HE严重程度无显著相关性,似乎不是治疗随访中可靠的生化标志物。