• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Current clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey: Reflections from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II.土耳其心脏再同步治疗的现状:心脏再同步治疗调查 II 的思考。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2020 Dec;24(6):382-396. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.02680.
2
The European Society of Cardiology Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey II: A comparison of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation practice in Europe and France.《欧洲心脏病学会心脏再同步治疗调查 II:欧洲与法国心脏再同步治疗植入实践的比较》。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Nov;112(11):713-722. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology (ESC) survey of cardiac resynchronization therapy-an Irish subset analysis.CRT 调查 II:欧洲心脏病学会 (ESC) 心脏再同步治疗调查——爱尔兰亚组分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Aug;189(3):895-905. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02173-y. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).多中心自动除颤器植入试验-心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT)中 QRS 形态对心脏再同步治疗效果的影响。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):1061-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960898. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
5
Upgrades from Previous Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Compared to De Novo Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantations: Results from CRT Survey-II in the Turkish Population.与首次心脏再同步治疗植入相比,先前心脏植入式电子设备的升级:土耳其人群中 CRT 调查 II 的结果。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2022 Apr;50(3):182-191. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2022.21107.
6
CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?CRT 调查 II:欧洲心脏病学会对 11088 例心脏再同步治疗患者的调查——谁对谁做了什么以及怎么做的?
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;20(6):1039-1051. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1142. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Comparison of current German and European practice in cardiac resynchronization therapy: lessons from the ESC/EHRA/HFA CRT Survey II.比较当前德国和欧洲心脏再同步治疗的实践:ESC/EHRA/HFA CRT 调查 II 的经验教训。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jul;109(7):832-844. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01574-z. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
8
Gender, underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy, and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation and left bundle branch block in heart failure.性别、心脏再同步治疗的未充分利用以及心力衰竭中QRS波增宽和左束支传导阻滞的预后影响
Europace. 2015 Mar;17(3):424-31. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu205. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
9
Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.心脏再同步治疗植入时右向左心室激活延迟时间延长与左束支传导阻滞患者临床结局改善相关。
Europace. 2016 Apr;18(4):550-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv117. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
QRS duration, bundle-branch block morphology, and outcomes among older patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.QRS 时限、束支传导阻滞形态与心力衰竭老年患者心脏再同步治疗的结局
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):617-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8641.

本文引用的文献

1
[Snapshot evaluation of heart failure in Turkey: Baseline characteristics of SELFIE-TR].土耳其心力衰竭的快速评估:SELFIE-TR的基线特征
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2019 Apr;47(3):198-206. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2019.66877.
2
Defibrillation testing and clinical outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients in atrial fibrillation at the time of implant: An analysis from the SIMPLE trial.在植入时患有心房颤动的患者中进行植入式心脏复律除颤器植入后的除颤测试和临床结果:来自 SIMPLE 试验的分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Jan;16(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
3
Indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Comparison of the Major International Guidelines.心脏再同步治疗适应证:主要国际指南比较。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;6(4):308-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.01.022.
4
CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?CRT 调查 II:欧洲心脏病学会对 11088 例心脏再同步治疗患者的调查——谁对谁做了什么以及怎么做的?
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;20(6):1039-1051. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1142. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
5
Defibrillator shocks and their effect on objective and subjective patient outcomes: Results of the PainFree SST clinical trial.除颤器电击及其对客观和主观患者结局的影响:PainFree SST 临床试验结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 May;15(5):734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 24.
6
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗工作组编写,欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20.
7
2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.2015年心律学会(HRS)/欧洲心律协会(EHRA)/亚太心律学会(APHRS)/拉丁美洲心律学会(SOLAECE)关于植入式心脏复律除颤器最佳程控与测试的专家共识声明
Europace. 2016 Feb;18(2):159-83. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv411. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey II: rationale and design.欧洲心脏再同步治疗调查 II:原理和设计。
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):137-41. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu312. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
9
2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).2013年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与再同步治疗特别工作组。与欧洲心律协会(EHRA)合作制定。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2281-329. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht150. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
10
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组关于心力衰竭管理的指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

土耳其心脏再同步治疗的现状:心脏再同步治疗调查 II 的思考。

Current clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey: Reflections from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University; Ankara-Turkey.

Department of Cardiology, Medical Park Göztepe Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Anatol J Cardiol. 2020 Dec;24(6):382-396. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.02680.

DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2020.02680
PMID:33253125
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7791302/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce mortality in selected patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). CRT Survey-II was a snapshot survey to assess current clinical practice with regard to CRT. Herein, we aimed to compare Turkish data with other countries of European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

METHODS

The survey was conducted between October 2015 and December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. All consecutive patients who underwent a de novo CRT implantation or a CRT upgrade were eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 288 centers included 11,088 patients. From Turkey, 16 centers recruited 424 patients representing 12.9% of all implantations. Compared to the entire cohort, Turkish patients were younger with a lower proportion of men and a higher proportion with ischemic etiology. Electrocardiography (ECG) showed sinus rhythm in 81.5%, a QRS duration of <130 ms in 10.1%, and ≥150 ms in 63.8% of patients. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was more common. Median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 25%, lower than in the overall ESC cohort, but NYHA class was more often II. Most common indication for CRT implantation was HF with a wide QRS (70.8%). Almost 98.3% of devices implanted were CRT-D, in contrast to the overall cohort. Fluoroscopy time was longer, but duration of overall procedure was shorter. LV lead implantation was unsuccessful in 2.6% patients. Periprocedural complication rate was 6.3%. The most common complication was bleeding. Remote monitoring was less utilized.

CONCLUSION

These are the first observational data reflecting the current CRT practice in Turkey and comparing it with other countries of Europe. Findings of this study may help detect gaps and provide insights for improvement.

摘要

目的

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)已被证明可降低射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的死亡率。CRT Survey-II 是一项快照调查,旨在评估 CRT 目前的临床实践。在此,我们旨在将土耳其数据与欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的其他国家进行比较。

方法

该调查于 2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 12 月在 42 个 ESC 成员国进行。所有接受新 CRT 植入或 CRT 升级的连续患者均符合条件。

结果

共有 288 个中心纳入了 11088 名患者。来自土耳其的 16 个中心招募了 424 名患者,占所有植入患者的 12.9%。与整个队列相比,土耳其患者年龄较小,男性比例较低,缺血性病因比例较高。心电图(ECG)显示窦性心律占 81.5%,QRS 持续时间<130ms 占 10.1%,≥150ms 占 63.8%的患者。左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)更为常见。中位左心室射血分数(LVEF)为 25%,低于 ESC 总体队列,但 NYHA 分级更为常见。CRT 植入的最常见适应证是宽 QRS 的心力衰竭(70.8%)。植入的设备几乎 98.3%为 CRT-D,与总体队列形成对比。透视时间较长,但总手术时间较短。LV 导联植入不成功的患者占 2.6%。围手术期并发症发生率为 6.3%。最常见的并发症是出血。远程监测利用较少。

结论

这些是反映土耳其当前 CRT 实践并与欧洲其他国家进行比较的首批观察性数据。本研究的结果可能有助于发现差距并提供改进的见解。