Du Wei, Han Weili, Dong Jiaqiang
State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 Shaanxi Province, PR China; Grade 2016, School of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 Shaanxi Province, PR China.
State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 Shaanxi Province, PR China.
Med Hypotheses. 2020 Nov;144:110211. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110211. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
Dysbiosis is a prominent feature of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, the efficacy of using antibiotics aiming at the aberrant gut microflora for IBD treatment are either unsuccessful or not persistent. In contrast, long-term oral vancomycin has been proved effective in controlling both the bile duct and gut inflammation of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), an autoimmune disease against the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts that holds a high rate of concomitant IBD and shares many common characteristics with IBD, including similar dysbiosis patterns. Two discrepancies of antibiotic usage might explain the dramatically different responses of the two diseases toward this strategy. First, the vast majority of antibiotic formulas for IBD management consist of broad-spectrum antibiotics mainly targeting gram-negative bacteria with some covering anaerobes and gram-positive ones, while vancomycin used for PSC treatment almost exclusively targets gram-positive bacteria. Several lines of clues suggested that gram-positive microorganisms might be responsible for the chronic inflammation observed in IBD and PSC. Second, improvement of liver test in PSC patients is usually observed after a relatively long period of oral vancomycin treatment (more than 12 weeks) and it takes even longer for gut mucosal healing. Moreover, long-term low dose oral vancomycin is required to prevent PSC recurrence. However, most trials of using antibiotics for IBD management is aiming at inducing remission with short treatment course (most less than 2 weeks) without maintenance. We hypothesize that the host antimicrobial response favors the growth of certain gram-positive intestinal bacteria in genetically predisposed individuals which is responsible for the aberrant immunological reaction towards the gut mucosa. Oral vancomycin induces disease remission by suppressing the pathogenic gram-positive microorganisms, but long course is needed since the gut inflammation is usually severe than that concomitant with PSC. Moreover, long-term maintenance is required to prevent the rebound of the pathogens and flare of the intestinal inflammation.
肠道菌群失调是炎症性肠病(IBD)的一个显著特征。然而,针对异常肠道微生物群使用抗生素治疗IBD的疗效要么不佳,要么不能持久。相比之下,长期口服万古霉素已被证明可有效控制原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)的胆管和肠道炎症,PSC是一种针对肝内和肝外胆管的自身免疫性疾病,其IBD伴发率高,且与IBD有许多共同特征,包括相似的肠道菌群失调模式。抗生素使用的两个差异可能解释了这两种疾病对该策略的截然不同的反应。首先,绝大多数用于IBD治疗的抗生素配方包含主要针对革兰氏阴性菌的广谱抗生素,有些还覆盖厌氧菌和革兰氏阳性菌,而用于PSC治疗的万古霉素几乎只针对革兰氏阳性菌。几条线索表明,革兰氏阳性微生物可能是IBD和PSC中观察到的慢性炎症的原因。其次,PSC患者的肝功能检查通常在口服万古霉素相对较长时间(超过12周)的治疗后得到改善,而肠道黏膜愈合所需时间甚至更长。此外,需要长期低剂量口服万古霉素以预防PSC复发。然而,大多数使用抗生素治疗IBD的试验旨在通过短疗程(大多数少于2周)诱导缓解,而不进行维持治疗。我们推测,在遗传易感个体中,宿主的抗菌反应有利于某些革兰氏阳性肠道细菌的生长,这是对肠道黏膜异常免疫反应的原因。口服万古霉素通过抑制致病性革兰氏阳性微生物诱导疾病缓解,但由于肠道炎症通常比PSC伴发的炎症更严重,因此需要较长疗程。此外,需要长期维持治疗以防止病原体反弹和肠道炎症复发。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020-6-7
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024-6-3
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018-2-7
World J Gastroenterol. 2017-7-7