Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 7712, Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil.
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Programa Pasturas y Forrajes. Estación Experimental INIA, Treinta y Tres. Ruta 8 km 281, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 1;754:142029. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142029. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Agriculture, and livestock production in particular, is criticized for being a contributor to global environmental change, including emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). Methane (CH) from grazing ruminants accounts for most of livestock's carbon footprint because a large share of them are reared under suboptimal grazing conditions, usually resulting in both low herbage intake and animal performance. Consequently, the CH quota attributed to animal maintenance is spread across few or no animal outputs, increasing the CH intensity [g CH/kg live weight (LW) gain or g CH/kg milk yield]. In this review, the generalized idea relating tropical pastures with low quality and intrinsically higher CH intensity is challenged by showing evidence that emissions from animals grazing tropical pastures can equal those of temperate grasses. We demonstrate the medium-to-high mitigation potential of some grazing management strategies to mitigate CH emissions from grazing ruminants and stress the predominant role that sward canopy structure (e.g., height) has over animal behavioral responses (e.g., intake rate), daily forage intake and resulting CH emissions. From this ecological perspective, we identify a grazing management concept aiming to offer the best sward structure that allows animals to optimize their daily herbage intake, creating opportunities to reduce CH intensity. We show the trade-off between animal performance and CH intensity, stressing that mitigation is substantial when grazing management is conducted under light-to-moderate intensities and optimize herbage intake and animal performance. We conclude that optimizing LW gain of grazing sheep and cattle to a threshold of 0.14 and 0.7 kg/day, respectively, would dramatically reduce CH intensity to approximately 0.2 kg CH/kg LW gain, as observed in some intensive feeding systems. This could represent a mitigation potential of around 55% for livestock commodities in pasture-based systems. Our results offer new insights to the debate concerning mitigation of environmental impacts of pastoral ecosystems.
农业,尤其是畜牧业,因其是全球环境变化的一个促成因素而受到批评,包括温室气体(GHG)的排放。放牧反刍动物产生的甲烷(CH)占畜牧业碳足迹的大部分,因为它们中的很大一部分是在次优的放牧条件下饲养的,通常导致草料摄入量和动物性能都较低。因此,归因于动物维持的 CH 配额分散在很少或没有动物产出上,增加了 CH 强度[g CH/kg 活重(LW)增重或 g CH/kg 产奶量]。在本综述中,通过展示证据表明,放牧热带牧场的动物排放可以与温带草地的排放相等,从而挑战了与低质量热带牧场相关的普遍观念,即具有内在较高 CH 强度。我们展示了一些放牧管理策略具有中等至高的减排潜力,可以减轻放牧反刍动物的 CH 排放,并强调了草地冠层结构(例如,高度)对动物行为反应(例如,采食量)、日草料摄入量和由此产生的 CH 排放的主要作用。从这个生态角度来看,我们确定了一个放牧管理概念,旨在提供最佳的草地结构,使动物能够优化其日常草料摄入量,从而有机会降低 CH 强度。我们展示了动物性能和 CH 强度之间的权衡,强调在放牧管理强度从轻到中等时,减排效果显著,并优化了草料摄入量和动物性能。我们得出的结论是,将放牧绵羊和牛的 LW 增重分别优化到 0.14 和 0.7kg/天的阈值,将大大降低 CH 强度,使其达到 0.2kg CH/kg LW 增重,这与一些集约化饲养系统中的观察结果相似。这可能代表基于牧场的系统中牲畜商品的减排潜力约为 55%。我们的研究结果为有关缓解放牧生态系统环境影响的辩论提供了新的见解。