Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, The University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Torrecardenas, 04009 Almeria, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238729.
(1) Background: Refractive surgery is an increasingly popular procedure for decreasing spectacle or contact lens dependency. The two most common surgical techniques to correct myopia are photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). This study demonstrates the long-term effectiveness, safety, and predictability of both techniques for the refractive surgery of myopia. (2) Methods: A retrospective non-randomized study was performed. We followed 509 PRK eyes and 310 FS-LASIK surgeries for ten years. Patients were followed-up after 3 months and after 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, gathering data on their uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The safety index of both procedures was defined as the quotient between the postoperative BCVA and the preoperative BCVA. We defined a procedure as safe if this quotient was equal to or greater than 1. The effectiveness index was calculated as the quotient between postoperative UCVA divided by the preoperative BCVA. (3) Results: The safety index was higher than 1 (1.09) and an effectiveness index of 0.82 after ten years of surgery in both groups was found. (4) Conclusion: These data demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness indices for both techniques, although FS-LASIK is a technique with better safety and effectiveness indices than PRK.
(1) 背景:屈光手术是一种越来越受欢迎的减少眼镜或隐形眼镜依赖的方法。两种最常见的矫正近视的手术技术是准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术(PRK)和飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)。本研究证明了这两种技术在近视屈光手术中的长期有效性、安全性和可预测性。
(2) 方法:进行了一项回顾性非随机研究。我们对 509 只 PRK 眼和 310 只 FS-LASIK 手术进行了长达十年的随访。术后 3 个月、1 个月、2 个月、5 个月和 10 个月时对患者进行随访,收集其未矫正视力(UCVA)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的数据。将两种手术的安全性指数定义为术后 BCVA 与术前 BCVA 的商。如果商等于或大于 1,则认为该程序是安全的。将有效性指数定义为术后 UCVA 除以术前 BCVA 的商。
(3) 结果:两组手术后十年的安全性指数均高于 1(1.09),有效性指数为 0.82。
(4) 结论:这些数据表明,这两种技术都具有出色的安全性和有效性指数,尽管 FS-LASIK 比 PRK 具有更好的安全性和有效性指数。