• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制作角膜瓣的方式和角膜特性会影响飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 术中不透明气泡层的发生。

Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02524-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-022-02524-6
PMID:35820852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9277786/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opaque bubble layer (OBL), which generates from photo-disruptive procedures on the cornea, has been a common phenomenon during femtosecond laser-assisted refractive surgeries and it would potentially impact eye tracking and flap lifting. And we have observed that an updated flap-making pattern could form less OBL clinically than the traditional pattern, which needed further approval. Thus, the purpose of this study is to prove our observation and investigate the possible risk factors related to the occurrence and type of OBL in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps using the Visumax laser system.

METHODS

This prospective study included 167 eyes of 86 patients (mean age: 27.5 ± 6.1 years) undergoing bilateral femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia/myopic astigmatism by the same surgeon from April 2020 to August 2020. Preoperative data on refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), and keratometry as well as intraoperative data were included for analysis. A new flap-making pattern creating an offset between flap-cut and side-cut was adopted to compare with the traditional pattern. The operation video of flap formation was analyzed to identify the existence and type of OBL. The area covered by OBL and the ratio of OBL to flap were calculated using Image J software.

RESULTS

Among 167 eyes, 54 eyes (32.3%) developed OBLs, consisting of 31 as hard OBL coexisting with soft OBL, and 23 as soft OBL alone. The OBL incidence was significantly reduced in eyes with the new flap-making pattern compared with the traditional pattern (13.8% vs. 52.5%, P < 0.001). Hard OBLs had larger area ratios than soft OBLs (14.3 ± 8.3% vs. 1.1 ± 1.8%, P < 0.001). Univariate analyses revealed that eyes with more myopia, thicker CCT, and traditional flap-making patterns were more likely to develop OBLs. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that more myopia, thicker CCT, and traditional flap-making pattern were risk factors for OBLs. A Larger corneal diameter was associated with a higher incidence of hard OBL when applying the traditional flap-making process.

CONCLUSION

More myopia, thicker CCT, and larger corneal diameter were risk factors for OBL development during flap creation, whereas a flap-making pattern with an offset between flap-cut and side-cut could reduce the incidence of OBL.

摘要

背景

在飞秒激光辅助屈光手术中,角膜上的光致破裂程序会产生不透明泡层(OBL),这是一种常见现象,可能会影响眼跟踪和瓣掀起。我们观察到,与传统模式相比,更新的瓣制作模式在临床上形成的 OBL 更少,这需要进一步证实。因此,本研究的目的是证明我们的观察结果,并调查与使用 Visumax 激光系统的 LASIK 瓣相关的 OBL 发生和类型的可能危险因素。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了 2020 年 4 月至 2020 年 8 月由同一位外科医生为 86 例(平均年龄:27.5±6.1 岁)双眼近视/近视散光患者行飞秒激光辅助 LASIK(FS-LASIK)的 167 只眼。分析了术前屈光度、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、角膜曲率以及术中数据。采用一种新的瓣制作模式,在瓣切割和侧切割之间形成偏移,与传统模式进行比较。通过分析瓣形成的手术视频来识别 OBL 的存在和类型。使用 Image J 软件计算 OBL 覆盖的面积和 OBL 与瓣的比值。

结果

在 167 只眼中,54 只眼(32.3%)出现 OBL,其中 31 只眼为硬 OBL 合并软 OBL,23 只眼为单纯软 OBL。与传统模式相比,新瓣制作模式的 OBL 发生率明显降低(13.8%比 52.5%,P<0.001)。硬 OBL 的面积比软 OBL 大(14.3±8.3%比 1.1±1.8%,P<0.001)。单因素分析显示,近视度数较高、CCT 较厚、采用传统瓣制作模式的眼更容易发生 OBL。多因素分析进一步证实,近视度数较高、CCT 较厚、采用传统瓣制作模式是 OBL 的危险因素。当采用传统瓣制作过程时,较大的角膜直径与硬 OBL 的发生率较高相关。

结论

在瓣制作过程中,近视度数较高、CCT 较厚、角膜直径较大是 OBL 发生的危险因素,而瓣切割和侧切割之间形成偏移的瓣制作模式可以降低 OBL 的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b4/9277786/48cf3eb2cb4e/12886_2022_2524_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b4/9277786/48cf3eb2cb4e/12886_2022_2524_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88b4/9277786/48cf3eb2cb4e/12886_2022_2524_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.制作角膜瓣的方式和角膜特性会影响飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 术中不透明气泡层的发生。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02524-6.
2
A Technique to Reduce Incidence of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation During LASIK Flap Creation Using the VisuMax Femtosecond Laser.一种使用VisuMax飞秒激光在LASIK瓣制作过程中降低不透明气泡层形成发生率的技术。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(9):584-590. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170621-06.
3
Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters.飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术中不透明气泡层的发生率:不同瓣设计参数的比较
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):635-641. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0323-3. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
4
Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism.比较 FS-LASIK 和 SMILE 矫正近视和近视散光的 OBL 风险因素。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1925-1931. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Opaque bubble layer: incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance.不透明气泡层:发生率、危险因素和临床相关性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Mar;40(3):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.055. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
Possible risk factors and clinical effects of an opaque bubble layer created with femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术中形成不透明气泡层的可能危险因素及临床影响
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jul;41(7):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.039. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
OCT Study of the Femtosecond Laser Opaque Bubble Layer.飞秒激光不透明气泡层的光学相干断层扫描研究
J Refract Surg. 2017 Jan 1;33(1):18-22. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20161027-01.
8
VisuMax Flap 2.0: a flap plus technique to reduce incidence of an opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.VisuMax 飞秒激光角膜制瓣系统 2.0:一种降低飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 术中角膜雾状混浊发生率的瓣加技术。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;261(4):1187-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05894-1. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
9
Influences of Flap Shape and Hinge Angle on Opaque Bubble Layer Formation in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Surgery.飞秒激光辅助LASIK手术中瓣片形状和铰链角度对不透明气泡层形成的影响
J Refract Surg. 2017 Mar 1;33(3):178-182. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20161219-02.
10
Incidence and Risk Factors of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation According to Flap Thickness During 500-kHz FS-LASIK.500kHz FS-LASIK 术中根据瓣厚度评估不透明气泡层形成的发生率和危险因素。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):583-589. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190814-01.

引用本文的文献

1
Based on TransRes-Pix2Pix network to generate the OBL image during SMILE surgery.基于TransRes-Pix2Pix网络在微笑手术期间生成口腔颌面部图像。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 May 21;13:1598475. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1598475. eCollection 2025.
2
Predicting an opaque bubble layer during small-incision lenticule extraction surgery based on deep learning.基于深度学习预测小切口透镜切除术期间的不透明气泡层
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Oct 30;12:1487482. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1487482. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.近视性准分子原位角膜磨镶术的结果:使用同一台准分子激光对三种不同飞秒激光与一种机械微型角膜刀的比较。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1047-1066. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00486-y. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Visual Quality Using a Medium Versus Small Contact Glass in Patients Undergoing SMILE With Large Corneal Diameters.大角膜直径患者行 SMILE 中、小接触镜的临床效果和视觉质量比较。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Mar;37(3):150-157. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201222-02. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Traumatic displacement of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps: an integrated clinical case presentation.
准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)瓣的外伤性移位:综合临床病例报告
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01938-y.
4
Long Term Follow-Up Safety and Effectiveness of Myopia Refractive Surgery.近视屈光手术的长期随访安全性和有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238729.
5
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.与使用飞秒激光进行准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)相比,使用机械微型角膜刀进行的成人近视或近视散光准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 7;4(4):CD012946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2.
6
Incidence and Risk Factors of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation According to Flap Thickness During 500-kHz FS-LASIK.500kHz FS-LASIK 术中根据瓣厚度评估不透明气泡层形成的发生率和危险因素。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Sep 1;35(9):583-589. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190814-01.
7
Traumatic corneal flap avulsion and loss 13 years after LASIK.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)13年后出现创伤性角膜瓣撕脱和缺失
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr-Jun;33(2):172-176. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
8
Late traumatic flap dislocation seven years after femtosecond laser-assisted keratomileusis.飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后七年发生迟发性外伤性角膜瓣移位
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 May 18;12(5):862-865. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.05.27. eCollection 2019.
9
Three-year outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和飞秒激光辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)治疗近视和近视散光的 3 年疗效。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;103(4):565-568. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312140. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
10
Risk Factors for Opaque Bubble Layer in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)中不透明气泡层的危险因素
J Refract Surg. 2017 Nov 1;33(11):759-764. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170821-02.