Commercial and Sensory Science, Department of Postharvest, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 39-43 Villányi Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Food Chemistry and Nutrition Science, Faculty of Food Science, Szent István University, 14-16 Somlói Street, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;20(23):6768. doi: 10.3390/s20236768.
The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spectral colour measurement, sensory, NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue methods for the classification of bee pollen of five different botanical origins. Chemometric methods (PCA, LDA) were used to classify bee pollen loads by analysing the statistical pattern of the samples and to determine the independent and combined effects of the above-mentioned methods. The results of the microscopic analysis identified 100% of sunflower, red clover, rapeseed and two polyfloral pollens mainly containing lakeshore bulrush and spiny plumeless thistle. The colour profiles of the samples were different for the five different samples. E-nose and NIR provided 100% classification accuracy, while e-tongue > 94% classification accuracy for the botanical origin identification using LDA. Partial least square regression (PLS) results built to regress on the sensory and spectral colour attributes using the fused data of NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue showed higher than 0.8 R during the validation except for one attribute, which was much higher compared to the independent models built for instruments.
花粉的化学成分差异很大,主要取决于产品的植物来源。因此,区分不同植物物种的花粉是一项至关重要的任务。在我们的工作中,我们旨在确定微观花粉分析、光谱颜色测量、感官、近红外光谱、电子鼻和电子舌方法在分类五种不同植物来源的蜜蜂花粉中的适用性。使用化学计量学方法(PCA、LDA)通过分析样品的统计模式对花粉负荷进行分类,并确定上述方法的独立和综合影响。微观分析的结果确定了 100%的向日葵、红三叶草、油菜和两种主要含有湖岸灯心草和多刺无梗蓟的多花粉。五种不同样品的颜色分布不同。电子鼻和近红外光谱提供了 100%的分类准确性,而电子舌使用 LDA 对植物来源的识别准确率>94%。使用近红外光谱、电子鼻和电子舌融合数据建立的偏最小二乘回归(PLS)模型,除了一个属性外,在验证期间的 R 值均高于 0.8,与为仪器建立的独立模型相比,该值要高得多。