Zhang Tian-Yu, Zhang Pei-Xun, Xue Feng, Zhang Dian-Ying, Jiang Bao-Guo
Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 South Avenue, Xi Zhi Men, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.
Institute of Trauma and Nerve Regeneration, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 30;21(1):792. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03810-4.
Vertebral augmentation is the first-line treatment for the osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures. Bone cement leakage is the most common complication of this surgery. This study aims to assess the risk factors for different types of cement leakage and provides a nomogram for predicting the cement intradiscal leakage.
We retrospectively reviewed 268 patients who underwent vertebral augmentation procedure between January 2015 and March 2019. The cement leakage risk factors were evaluated by univariate analysis. Different types of cement leakage risk factors were identified by the stepwise logistic analysis. We provided a nomogram for predicting the cement intradiscal leakage and used the concordance index to assess the prediction ability.
A total of 295 levels of vertebrae were included, with a leakage rate of 32.5%. Univariate analysis showed delayed surgery and lower vertebral compression ratio were the independent risk factors of cement leakage. The stepwise logistic analysis revealed percutaneous vertebroplasty was a risk factor in vein cement leakage; delayed surgery, preoperative compression ratio, and upper endplate disruption were in intradiscal cement leakage; age, preoperative fracture severity, and intravertebral vacuum cleft were in perivertebral soft tissue cement leakage; no factor was in spinal canal cement leakage. The nomogram for intradiscal cement leakage had a precise prediction ability with an original concordance index of 0.75.
Delayed surgery and more vertebral compression increase the risk of cement leakage. Different types of cement leakage have different risk factors. We provided a nomogram for precise predicting the intradiscal cement leakage.
椎体强化术是骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的一线治疗方法。骨水泥渗漏是该手术最常见的并发症。本研究旨在评估不同类型骨水泥渗漏的危险因素,并提供一个预测椎间盘内骨水泥渗漏的列线图。
我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2019年3月期间接受椎体强化手术的268例患者。通过单因素分析评估骨水泥渗漏的危险因素。通过逐步逻辑分析确定不同类型骨水泥渗漏的危险因素。我们提供了一个预测椎间盘内骨水泥渗漏的列线图,并使用一致性指数评估预测能力。
共纳入295个椎体节段,渗漏率为32.5%。单因素分析显示手术延迟和椎体压缩率较低是骨水泥渗漏的独立危险因素。逐步逻辑分析显示,经皮椎体成形术是静脉内骨水泥渗漏的危险因素;手术延迟、术前压缩率和上位终板破坏是椎间盘内骨水泥渗漏的危险因素;年龄、术前骨折严重程度和椎体内真空裂隙是椎旁软组织骨水泥渗漏的危险因素;椎管内骨水泥渗漏无相关危险因素。椎间盘内骨水泥渗漏的列线图具有精确的预测能力,原始一致性指数为0.75。
手术延迟和椎体压缩程度增加会增加骨水泥渗漏的风险。不同类型的骨水泥渗漏有不同的危险因素。我们提供了一个用于精确预测椎间盘内骨水泥渗漏的列线图。