Semaan Hassan, Obri Tawfik, Bazerbashi Mohamad, Paull Daniel, Liu Xiaochen, Sarrouj Marah, Elgafy Hossein
1 Department of Radiology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA.
2 Department of Orthopedics Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA.
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jul;59(7):861-868. doi: 10.1177/0284185117732599. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Background Injection of cement during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty can leak into surrounding structures and could be symptomatic. Purpose To identify the sites and incidence of cement extravasation after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty, and to evaluate their impacts on clinical outcomes. Material and Methods A retrospective review of 316 patients treated with kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty; 411 cases were included (223 kyphoplasty and 188 vertebroplasty). Cement extravasation was evaluated postoperatively by computed tomography (CT) scan of the spine. Clinical outcomes were assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of cement extravasation between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty groups ( P < 0.04). The most common site of cement extravasation was in paravertebral soft tissues for vertebroplasty (n = 33, 40.7%) and for kyphoplasty (n = 30, 30%). In the subgroup where cement leaked into the intradiscal space, adjacent vertebral body fractures occurred in 3/26 vertebrae (11.5%) in the vertebroplasty group and in 2/18 vertebrae (11.1%) in the kyphoplasty group. Both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in both VAS ( P < 0.001) and ODI scores ( P < 0.001). There was no significantly difference in patient satisfaction between those who had cement extravasation and those who did not, in both groups. Conclusion Kyphoplasty has an advantage in terms of less risk of cement extravasation. However, this factor did not reflect on subsequent sequelae or final clinical outcomes. This study did not find a distinct correlation between intradiscal cement extravasation and increased risk of adjacent vertebral fractures.
背景 在椎体成形术和后凸成形术期间注射骨水泥可能会渗漏到周围结构中并引发症状。目的 确定后凸成形术和椎体成形术后骨水泥渗漏的部位和发生率,并评估其对临床结果的影响。材料与方法 回顾性分析316例行后凸成形术和椎体成形术治疗的患者;共纳入411例病例(223例后凸成形术和188例椎体成形术)。术后通过脊柱计算机断层扫描(CT)评估骨水泥渗漏情况。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)评估临床结果。结果 椎体成形术组和后凸成形术组骨水泥渗漏发生率存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.04)。骨水泥渗漏最常见的部位,椎体成形术是椎旁软组织(n = 33,40.7%),后凸成形术是椎旁软组织(n = 30, 30%)。在骨水泥渗漏至椎间盘间隙的亚组中,椎体成形术组26个椎体中有3个(11.5%)发生相邻椎体骨折,后凸成形术组18个椎体中有2个(11.1%)发生相邻椎体骨折。两组VAS评分(P < 0.001)和ODI评分(P < 0.001)均有统计学显著下降。两组中发生骨水泥渗漏和未发生骨水泥渗漏的患者在患者满意度方面无显著差异。结论 后凸成形术在骨水泥渗漏风险较低方面具有优势。然而,这一因素并未反映在后续后遗症或最终临床结果上。本研究未发现椎间盘内骨水泥渗漏与相邻椎体骨折风险增加之间存在明显相关性。