Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jalan Diponegoro No. 69, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
University of Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Malar J. 2020 Nov 30;19(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03511-2.
Following a dramatic decline of malaria cases in Aceh province, geographically-based reactive case detection (RACD) was recently evaluated as a tool to improve surveillance with the goal of malaria elimination. While RACD detected few cases in households surrounding index cases, engaging in forest work was identified as a risk factor for malaria and infections from Plasmodium knowlesi-a non-human primate malaria parasite-were more common than expected. This qualitative formative assessment was conducted to improve understanding of malaria risk from forest work and identify strategies for targeted surveillance among forest workers, including adapting reactive case detection.
Between June and August, 2016, five focus groups and 18 in-depth interviews with forest workers and key informants were conducted in each of four subdistricts in Aceh Besar and Aceh Jaya districts. Themes included: types of forest activities, mobility of workers, interactions with non-human primates, malaria prevention and treatment-seeking behaviours, and willingness to participate in malaria surveys at forest work sites and using peer-referral.
Reported forest activities included mining, logging, and agriculture in the deep forest and along the forest fringe. Forest workers, particularly miners and loggers, described often spending weeks to months at work sites in makeshift housing, rarely utilizing mosquito prevention and, upon fever, self-medicating and seeking care from traditional healers or pharmacies rather than health facilities. Non-human primates are frequently observed near work sites, and most forest work locations are within a day's journey of health clinics. Employers and workers expressed interest in undertaking malaria testing and in participating in survey recruitment by peer-referral and at work sites.
Diverse groups of forest workers in Aceh are potentially exposed to malaria through forest work. Passive surveillance and household-based screening may under-estimate malaria burden due to extended stays in the forest and health-seeking behaviours. Adapting active surveillance to specifically target forest workers through work-site screening and/or peer-referral appears promising for addressing currently undetected infections.
在亚齐省疟疾病例急剧下降后,最近评估了基于地理的反应性病例检测(RACD)作为一种改进监测的工具,目标是消除疟疾。虽然 RACD 在围绕病例的家庭中发现的病例很少,但从事森林工作被确定为疟疾的一个风险因素,而且感染疟原虫 knowlesi(一种非人类灵长类疟疾寄生虫)的情况比预期更为常见。进行这项定性形成性评估是为了更好地了解森林工作中的疟疾风险,并确定针对森林工人的目标监测策略,包括调整反应性病例检测。
2016 年 6 月至 8 月,在亚齐 Besar 和亚齐 Jaya 区的四个分区中,每个分区都进行了五次焦点小组和 18 次与森林工人和关键信息提供者的深入访谈。主题包括:森林活动类型、工人的流动性、与非人类灵长类动物的互动、疟疾预防和治疗寻求行为,以及在森林工作地点和使用同伴推荐参与疟疾调查的意愿。
报告的森林活动包括在深林和森林边缘进行采矿、伐木和农业。森林工人,特别是矿工和伐木工人,描述说他们经常在工作地点的临时住房中工作数周或数月,很少使用蚊虫预防措施,一旦发烧,就会自行服药,并寻求传统治疗师或药店的治疗,而不是医疗机构。非人类灵长类动物经常在工作地点附近被观察到,大多数森林工作地点都在一天的路程内有诊所。雇主和工人表示有兴趣进行疟疾检测,并通过同伴推荐和在工作地点参与调查招聘。
亚齐省不同群体的森林工人通过森林工作可能接触到疟疾。由于在森林中停留时间长和寻求医疗服务的行为,被动监测和基于家庭的筛查可能会低估疟疾负担。通过工作地点筛查和/或同伴推荐专门针对森林工人进行主动监测,似乎是解决目前未被发现的感染的有希望的方法。