Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Am J Surg. 2021 Feb;221(2):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.044. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) contain narrative 'entrustment roadmaps' designed to describe specific behaviors associated with different entrustment levels. However, these roadmaps were created using expert committee consensus, with little data available for guidance. Analysis of actual EPA assessment narrative comments using natural language processing may enhance our understanding of resident entrustment in actual practice.
All text comments associated with EPA microassessments at a single institution were combined. EPA-entrustment level pairs (e.g. Gallbladder Disease-Level 1) were identified as documents. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a common machine learning algorithm, was used to identify latent topics in the documents associated with a single EPA. These topics were then reviewed for interpretability by human raters.
Over 18 months, 1015 faculty EPA microassessments were collected from 64 faculty for 80 residents. LDA analysis identified topics that mapped 1:1 to EPA entrustment levels (Gammas >0.99). These LDA topics appeared to trend coherently with entrustment levels (words demonstrating high entrustment were consistently found in high entrustment topics, word demonstrating low entrustment were found in low entrustment topics).
LDA is capable of identifying topics relevant to progressive surgical entrustment and autonomy in EPA comments. These topics provide insight into key behaviors that drive different level of resident autonomy and may allow for data-driven revision of EPA entrustment maps.
可委托专业活动 (EPAs) 包含叙述性“委托路线图”,旨在描述与不同委托级别相关的特定行为。然而,这些路线图是通过专家委员会的共识创建的,几乎没有可用的数据来指导。使用自然语言处理分析实际 EPA 评估叙述性评论可以增强我们对居民实际实践中委托的理解。
将单个机构中与 EPA 微观评估相关的所有文本评论合并。EPA 委托级别对(例如,胆囊疾病-1 级)被确定为文档。潜在狄利克雷分配 (LDA) 是一种常用的机器学习算法,用于识别与单个 EPA 相关的文档中的潜在主题。然后,由人类评分员对这些主题进行可解释性审查。
在 18 个月的时间里,从 64 名教师那里收集了 1015 名教师的 EPA 微观评估,涉及 80 名住院医师。LDA 分析确定了与 EPA 委托级别 1:1 对应的主题(Gamma 值>0.99)。这些 LDA 主题似乎与委托级别一致(表现出高度委托的词始终出现在高委托主题中,表现出低度委托的词出现在低度委托主题中)。
LDA 能够识别与渐进式外科委托和 EPA 评论中的自主权相关的主题。这些主题深入了解了推动不同居民自主权水平的关键行为,并可能允许对 EPA 委托地图进行数据驱动的修订。