Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心力衰竭患者的有益和有害影响:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。

Beneficial and harmful effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology Section, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark

Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2020 Nov;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001294.

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) (sacubitril/valsartan) as a replacement for angiotensin-converting-enzymeinhibitor (ACE-I) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. The effects of ARNIs have not previously been assessed in a systematic review. We searched for relevant trials until October 2019 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, BIOSIS, CNKI, VIP, WanFang and CBM. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. We systematically assessed the risks of random errors and systematic errors. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129336. 48 trials randomising 19 086 participants were included. The ARNI assessed in all trials was sacubitril/valsartan. ACE-I or ARB were used as control interventions. Trials randomising HFrEF participants (27 trials) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) participants (four trials) were analysed separately. In HFrEF participants, meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses showed evidence of a beneficial effect of sacubitril/valsartan when assessing all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR), 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.94) and serious adverse events (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93); and the results did not differ between the guideline recommended target population and HFrEF participants in general. We found no evidence of an effect of sacubitril/valsartan in HFpEF participants. Sacubitril/valsartan compared with either ACE-I or ARB seems to have a beneficial effect in patients with HFrEF. Our results indicate that sacubitril/valsartan might be beneficial in a wider population of patients with heart failure than the guideline recommended target population. Sacubitril/valsartan does not seem to show evidence of a difference compared with valsartan in patients with HFpEF.

摘要

目前的指南建议,在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中,如果尽管接受了最佳药物治疗,但仍有症状,可以用血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)(沙库巴曲缬沙坦)替代血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-I)。ARNI 的效果以前并未在系统评价中评估过。我们在 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS、BIOSIS、CNKI、VIP、WanFang 和 CBM 中搜索了截至 2019 年 10 月的相关试验。我们的主要结局是全因死亡率和严重不良事件。我们系统地评估了随机误差和系统误差的风险。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42019129336。纳入了 48 项随机分配 19086 名参与者的试验。所有试验中评估的 ARNI 均为沙库巴曲缬沙坦。ACE-I 或 ARB 用作对照干预。单独分析了随机分配 HFrEF 参与者(27 项试验)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)参与者(4 项试验)的试验。在 HFrEF 参与者中,荟萃分析和试验序贯分析显示,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在评估全因死亡率(风险比(RR),0.86;95%CI,0.79 至 0.94)和严重不良事件(RR,0.89;95%CI,0.86 至 0.93)时具有有益效果;并且结果在指南推荐的目标人群和一般 HFrEF 参与者之间没有差异。我们没有发现沙库巴曲缬沙坦对 HFpEF 参与者有影响的证据。与 ACE-I 或 ARB 相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在 HFrEF 患者中似乎具有有益作用。我们的结果表明,与指南推荐的目标人群相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦可能对更广泛的心力衰竭患者人群有益。沙库巴曲缬沙坦在 HFpEF 患者中与缬沙坦相比似乎没有差异的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c2/7705560/3d604159a460/openhrt-2020-001294f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验