Haseeb Muhammad Talha, Nouman Aslam Muhammad, Avanteeka Fnu, Khalid Umar Abdul Rehman, Zubaer Ahmad Dewan, Senaratne Mithum, Almaalouli Bsher, Hirani Shamsha
Department of Internal Medicine, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
College of Medicine, King Edwards Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 20;15(3):e36392. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36392. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of angiontensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This meta-analysis was conducted and reported in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Two authors carried out a scientific literature search on online databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. The following keywords or corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were used for the search of relevant articles: "heart failure with reduced ejection fraction," "angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor," "Angiotensin receptor blockers," and "clinical outcomes." Outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included changes in ejection fraction (EF) from baseline in percentage. Other outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization due to heart failure. Adverse events assessed in the present meta-analysis included hypokalemia, acute kidney injury, and hypotension. Total 10 studies were included. This meta-analysis showed that treatment with ARNI was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death compared to control groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of change of EF from baseline or hospitalization related to heart failure. However, the risk of hypotension was significantly higher in patients receiving ARNI. The study findings support the use of ARNI as first-line therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Further studies are required to determine the optimal use of ARNI in heart failure management and to investigate the mechanisms underlying the increased risk of hypotension.
本荟萃分析旨在比较血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中的安全性和有效性。本荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明的指南进行并报告。两位作者在包括EMBASE、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆在内的在线数据库中进行了科学文献检索。使用以下关键词或相应的医学主题词(MeSH)来检索相关文章:“射血分数降低的心力衰竭”、“血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂”、“血管紧张素受体阻滞剂”和“临床结局”。本荟萃分析评估的结局包括射血分数(EF)自基线起的百分比变化。本荟萃分析评估的其他结局包括全因死亡率、心血管死亡和因心力衰竭住院。本荟萃分析评估的不良事件包括低钾血症、急性肾损伤和低血压。共纳入10项研究。本荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,ARNI治疗与全因死亡率和心血管死亡风险显著降低相关。两组在EF自基线的变化或与心力衰竭相关的住院方面无显著差异。然而,接受ARNI治疗的患者低血压风险显著更高。研究结果支持将ARNI用作射血分数降低的心力衰竭的一线治疗。需要进一步研究以确定ARNI在心力衰竭管理中的最佳使用方法,并研究低血压风险增加的潜在机制。