Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦与缬沙坦相比在射血分数轻度降低和保留的心力衰竭患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

The Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared to Valsartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fractions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Kommu Sharath, Berg Richard L

机构信息

Department of Hospital Medicine, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Rice Lake, WI 54868, USA.

Department of Medicine, UW School of Public Health and Medicine, Madison, WI 53705, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 9;13(6):1572. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061572.

Abstract

: Sacubitril/valsartan improves heart failure (HF) outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have shown inconsistent results. We conducted this meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan within this specific patient population. : We searched the MEDLINE database and ClinicalTrials.gov and identified four RCTs that could be included in our analysis, with 3375 patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 3362 in the valsartan group. : Our study shows that, in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, sacubitril/valsartan was superior to valsartan in some of the key HF outcomes, such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ CSS), with a small but significant mean difference of 1.13 (95% confidence interval or CI of 0.15 to 2.11, -value 0.024), an improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (odds ratio or OR of 1.32, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58, -value 0.002), and the composite outcome of hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular death, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.86 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.99, -value 0.04). However, there was no additional benefit with sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan for the outcomes of cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. In terms of side effects, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a higher risk of hypotension when compared to valsartan (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.19, -value < 0.0001), but did not show an increased risk of hyperkalemia or worsening renal function. : In individuals with HFmrEF or HFpEF, sacubitril/valsartan can result in improvements in the HF outcomes of the KCCQ CSS, the NYHA class, and the composite outcome of hospitalization for HF and cardiovascular death when compared to valsartan. While there was a higher risk of hypotension with sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan, there was no corresponding increase in the risk of hyperkalemia or worsening renal function.

摘要

沙库巴曲缬沙坦可改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的心力衰竭(HF)预后。然而,针对射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者的随机对照试验(RCT)结果并不一致。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以全面评估在这一特定患者群体中,与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的疗效和安全性。我们检索了MEDLINE数据库和ClinicalTrials.gov,并确定了四项可纳入我们分析的RCT,沙库巴曲缬沙坦组有3375例患者,缬沙坦组有3362例患者。我们的研究表明,在HFmrEF和HFpEF患者中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在一些关键的HF预后方面优于缬沙坦,如堪萨斯城心肌病问卷临床总结评分(KCCQ CSS),平均差异虽小但显著,为1.13(95%置信区间或CI为0.15至2.11,P值为0.024),纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级有所改善(优势比或OR为1.32,95%CI为1.11至1.58,P值为0.002),以及HF住院和心血管死亡的复合结局,相对风险(RR)为0.86(95%CI为0.75至0.99,P值为0.04)。然而,与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在心血管死亡和全因死亡率结局方面没有额外益处。在副作用方面,与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦发生低血压的风险更高(OR为1.67,95%CI为1.27至2.19,P值<0.0001),但未显示高钾血症风险增加或肾功能恶化。在HFmrEF或HFpEF个体中,与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦可改善KCCQ CSS、NYHA分级以及HF住院和心血管死亡的复合结局等HF预后。虽然与缬沙坦相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦发生低血压的风险更高,但高钾血症风险或肾功能恶化风险并未相应增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10971386/9085d6797c11/jcm-13-01572-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验