• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床结局测量指标对慢性便秘临床试验中安慰剂反应率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Impact of Clinical Outcome Measures on Placebo Response Rates in Clinical Trials for Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;11(11):e00255. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000255.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000255
PMID:33259160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7594913/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Chronic constipation (CC) is a recurrent functional bowel disorder worldwide. The purpose of this study is to examine its pooled placebo response rate and compare placebo response level in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different endpoint assessments.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were electronically searched for therapeutic RCTs of CC with placebo control. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were performed independently by 2 reviewers. All the statistical calculation and analysis were performed using R 3.6.0. Our protocol has registered in PROSPERO with registration number: CRD42019121287.

RESULTS

There were 46 studies included with 5,992 constipated patients allocated to the placebo arm in total. The pooled placebo response rate was 28.75% (95% confidence interval: 23.83%-33.67%) with significant heterogeneity among trials ((Equation is included in full-text article.)= 93.6%). Treatment efficacy assessed using subjective improvement had a significantly higher placebo response rate than that assessed with improvement in complete (spontaneous) bowel movements or composite improvement (41.40% vs 18.31% or 20.35%, P < 0.001). According to the results of meta-regression, active treatment and endpoint assessment were most likely to lead to the huge heterogeneity among studies.

DISCUSSION

Patients with CC have significant response level to placebo. Based on findings in this study, we do not recommend subjective improvement as endpoint while designing therapeutic RCTs for chronic constipated patients.

摘要

目的

慢性便秘(CC)是一种全球范围内反复发作的功能性肠病。本研究旨在评估其汇总安慰剂反应率,并比较不同终点评估的随机对照试验(RCT)中的安慰剂反应水平。

方法

通过电子检索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase,以获取 CC 安慰剂对照治疗的 RCT 研究。由 2 位评审员独立进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。所有的统计计算和分析均使用 R 3.6.0 进行。我们的方案已在 PROSPERO 中注册,注册号为:CRD42019121287。

结果

共纳入 46 项研究,总计 5992 例便秘患者被分配到安慰剂组。汇总的安慰剂反应率为 28.75%(95%置信区间:23.83%-33.67%),各试验间存在显著的异质性((Equation is included in full-text article.)=93.6%)。采用主观改善评估的治疗效果的安慰剂反应率显著高于采用完全(自发)排便改善或综合改善评估的安慰剂反应率(41.40%比 18.31%或 20.35%,P<0.001)。根据荟萃回归的结果,积极治疗和终点评估最有可能导致各研究间存在巨大的异质性。

讨论

CC 患者对安慰剂有显著的反应水平。基于本研究的结果,我们不建议将主观改善作为慢性便秘患者治疗 RCT 的终点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/1c86c061ff74/ct9-11-e00255-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/3eeceed5a078/ct9-11-e00255-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/6785267bf647/ct9-11-e00255-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/918514affe33/ct9-11-e00255-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/1c86c061ff74/ct9-11-e00255-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/3eeceed5a078/ct9-11-e00255-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/6785267bf647/ct9-11-e00255-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/918514affe33/ct9-11-e00255-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2a/7594913/1c86c061ff74/ct9-11-e00255-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Clinical Outcome Measures on Placebo Response Rates in Clinical Trials for Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.临床结局测量指标对慢性便秘临床试验中安慰剂反应率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;11(11):e00255. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000255.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).Cochrane系统评价:渗透性和刺激性泻药用于儿童便秘管理(综述)
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):57-109. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1893.
4
Placebo response rate in patients with chronic constipation: A protocol for systematic review.慢性便秘患者的安慰剂反应率:一项系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19020. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019020.
5
Efficacy and acceptability of different probiotic products plus laxatives for pediatric functional constipation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同益生菌产品联合泻药治疗小儿功能性便秘的疗效和可接受性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Aug;183(8):3531-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05568-6. Epub 2024 May 29.
6
Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.预防产后便秘的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 18;2015(9):CD011625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011625.pub2.
7
Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation.用于治疗儿童便秘的渗透性和刺激性泻药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD009118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009118.pub2.
8
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults.生物反馈疗法治疗成人慢性特发性便秘
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD008486. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008486.pub2.
9
Effects of linaclotide in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or chronic constipation: a meta-analysis.利那洛肽治疗便秘型肠易激综合征和慢性便秘患者的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1084-1092.e3; quiz e68. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.032. Epub 2013 May 2.
10
Management of chronic constipation in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者慢性便秘的管理
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;36(1):11-22. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0724-2. Epub 2016 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and acceptability of different probiotic products plus laxatives for pediatric functional constipation: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同益生菌产品联合泻药治疗小儿功能性便秘的疗效和可接受性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Aug;183(8):3531-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05568-6. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Contextual effects: how to, and how not to, quantify them.语境效应:如何以及如何避免量化它们。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02152-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Placebo Response in Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.安慰剂效应在慢性特发性便秘中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;114(12):1838-1846. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000399.
2
Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应对临床实践的影响:专家共识。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):204-210. doi: 10.1159/000490354. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
Chronic constipation.慢性便秘。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Dec 14;3:17095. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.95.
4
Effects of 28-day Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 supplementation on colonic transit time and gastrointestinal symptoms in adults with functional constipation: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, and dose-ranging trial.双歧杆菌动物亚种 HN019 补充剂对功能性便秘成人结肠传输时间和胃肠道症状的影响:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、剂量范围研究。
Gut Microbes. 2018;9(3):236-251. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1412908. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Informed consent and clinical trials: where is the placebo effect?知情同意与临床试验:安慰剂效应何在?
BMJ. 2017 Feb 3;356:j463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j463.
6
Efficacy of Synbiotics in Patients with Slow Transit Constipation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.合生元对慢传输型便秘患者的疗效:一项前瞻性随机试验
Nutrients. 2016 Sep 28;8(10):605. doi: 10.3390/nu8100605.
7
Acupuncture for Chronic Severe Functional Constipation: A Randomized Trial.针刺治疗慢性严重功能性便秘:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Dec 6;165(11):761-769. doi: 10.7326/M15-3118. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Pyramids are guides not rules: the evolution of the evidence pyramid.金字塔是指南而非规则:证据金字塔的演变
Evid Based Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):121-2. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110498. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
9
New evidence pyramid.新的证据金字塔
Evid Based Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):125-7. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Bowel Disorders.肠道疾病
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031.