Suppr超能文献

在包括人表皮生长因子受体 2 无扩增转移乳腺癌患者在内的随机 2 期 XeNa 研究中,长春瑞滨节拍治疗联合卡培他滨口服是可耐受的。

Metronomic treatment of vinorelbine with oral capecitabine is tolerable in the randomized Phase 2 study XeNa including patients with HER2 non-amplified metastatic breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Oncology, Region Hospital of West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2021 Feb;60(2):157-164. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1851045. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metronomic treatment is hypothesized to be less toxic and more effective as compared to standard maximal tolerable dosing treatment in metastatic cancer disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We tested the metronomic treatment principle with vinorelbine in a randomized phase 2 setting combined with standard capecitabine treatment in the XeNa trial with Clinical Trials.gov identifier number: NCT0141771. 120 patients with disseminated HER2 non-amplified breast cancer were included. Randomization was between Arm A: vinorelbine 60 mg/m day 1 + day 8 in the first cycle followed by 80 mg/m day 1 + day 8 in the following cycles or Arm B: vinorelbine 50 mg three times a week. Capecitabine 1000 mg/m twice a day for days 1-14 was administered in both arms.

RESULTS

The treatment was generally well-tolerated. The response rate (RR) was 24% (arm A) 29% (arm B) ( = .67). The clinical benefit rate (CBR) 46.8% (arm A) 51.7% (arm B) ( = .72). We found a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9-10.3) in arm A and 6.3 months (95% CI 4.1-8.5) in arm B ( = .25) whereas median overall survival (OS) was 23.3 months (95% CI 20.2-26.4) in arm A and 22.3 months (95% CI 14.3-30.3) in arm B ( = .76).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that the combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine was well tolerated. Metronomic treatment can be used with acceptable adverse events (AEs), but we did not find significant difference in the effect compared to the standard treatment.

摘要

背景

与标准最大耐受剂量治疗相比,节拍治疗在转移性癌症疾病中被认为毒性更小、更有效。

材料和方法

我们在 XeNa 试验中以随机 2 期设置测试了长春瑞滨的节拍治疗原则,该试验与临床试验.gov 标识符号:NCT0141771 相结合,采用标准卡培他滨治疗。纳入了 120 例播散性 HER2 非扩增性乳腺癌患者。随机分组为 A 组:第 1 周期第 1 天和第 8 天给予长春瑞滨 60mg/m,随后在接下来的周期中给予 80mg/m;或 B 组:长春瑞滨 50mg,每周 3 次。在两个组中,卡培他滨 1000mg/m,每天两次,第 1-14 天。

结果

该治疗通常耐受良好。客观缓解率(RR)为 24%(A 组),29%(B 组)(=0.67)。临床获益率(CBR)为 46.8%(A 组),51.7%(B 组)(=0.72)。我们发现 A 组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 7.1 个月(95%置信区间[CI] 3.9-10.3),B 组为 6.3 个月(95%CI 4.1-8.5)(=0.25),而 A 组的中位总生存期(OS)为 23.3 个月(95%CI 20.2-26.4),B 组为 22.3 个月(95%CI 14.3-30.3)(=0.76)。

结论

我们证实长春瑞滨和卡培他滨的联合治疗是可以耐受的。节拍治疗可以使用可接受的不良事件(AE),但与标准治疗相比,我们没有发现效果有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验