Roosendaal R, Bakker-Woudenberg I A, van den Berghe-van Raffe M, Vink-van den Berg J C, Michel M F
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Therapy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1987 Dec 11;9 Suppl:S33-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02075257.
The antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime against Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo were compared. Although there was only a minor difference in MBC values between both drugs ciprofloxacin demonstrated a high and dose-dependent bacterial killing rate in vitro and in lungs of leukopenic rats in contrast to the more time-dependent bactericidal activity of ceftazidime. After treatment of a K.pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia the efficacy of ciprofloxacin was only slightly influenced by the mode of administration, either at 6-h intervals or continuously, whereas ceftazidime was far more effective after continuous administration. This resulted in a superior efficacy of ciprofloxacin after intermittent treatment as compared to ceftazidime, whereas ceftazidime was more effective after continuous administration as compared to ciprofloxacin. Also ciprofloxacin proved to be bactericidal against bacteria that were not actively growing, both in vitro and in vivo, whereas ceftazidime was not.
比较了环丙沙星与头孢他啶对肺炎克雷伯菌的体外和体内抗菌活性。虽然两种药物的最低杀菌浓度(MBC)值只有微小差异,但与头孢他啶更具时间依赖性的杀菌活性相比,环丙沙星在体外和白细胞减少大鼠的肺部均表现出高且剂量依赖性的细菌杀灭率。在治疗肺炎克雷伯菌肺炎和败血症后,环丙沙星的疗效仅受给药方式(每6小时一次或持续给药)的轻微影响,而头孢他啶持续给药后效果要好得多。这导致间歇治疗后环丙沙星的疗效优于头孢他啶,而持续给药后头孢他啶比环丙沙星更有效。此外,环丙沙星在体外和体内均被证明对非活跃生长的细菌具有杀菌作用,而头孢他啶则不然。