From the Department of Orthopaedics (MB, TG, RS, JMS, MF), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine (JA, MB) and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (MS, BH).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Aug 1;38(8):872-879. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001398.
Intra-operative muscle relaxation is often required in orthopaedic surgery and the hand train-of-four (TOF) test is usually used for its quantification. However, even though full muscle relaxation is claimed by anaesthesiologists based on a TOF count of zero, surgeons observe residual muscle activity.
The aim of the study was to assess if hand or foot TOF adequately represents intra-operative muscle relaxation compared with multiple motor evoked potentials.
Prospective observational study.
A single-centre study performed between February 2016 and December 2018 at the Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Twenty patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal fusion were prospectively enrolled in this study after giving written informed consent.
To assess neuromuscular blockade (NMB) with the intermediate duration nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agent rocuronium, hand TOF (adductor pollicis) and foot TOF (flexor hallucis brevis) monitoring, and muscle motor evoked potentials (MMEPs) from the upper and lower extremities were assessed prior to surgery under general anaesthesia. Following baseline measurements, muscle relaxation was performed with rocuronium until the spinal surgeon observed sufficient relaxation for surgical intervention. At this timepoint, NMB was assessed by TOF and MMEP.
The primary outcome was to determine the different effect of rocuronium on muscle relaxation comparing hand and foot TOF with the paraspinal musculature assessed by MMEP.
Hand TOF was more resistant to NMB and had a shorter recovery time than foot TOF. When comparing MMEPs, muscle relaxation occurred first in the hip abductors, and the paraspinal and deltoid muscles. The most resistant muscle to NMB was the abductor digiti minimi. Direct comparison showed that repetitive MMEPs simultaneously recorded from various muscles at the upper and lower extremities and from paraspinal muscles reflect muscle relaxation similar to TOF testing.
Hand TOF is superior to foot TOF in assessing muscle relaxation during spinal surgery. Hand TOF adequately represents the degree of muscle relaxation not only for the paraspinal muscles but also for all orthopaedic surgical sites where NMB is crucial for good surgical conditions.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03318718).
矫形外科手术中通常需要术中肌肉松弛,并且通常使用手 train-of-four(TOF)测试来对其进行定量。但是,尽管麻醉师根据 TOF 计数为零声称完全肌肉松弛,但外科医生仍观察到残余肌肉活动。
本研究的目的是评估手或脚 TOF 是否与多个运动诱发电位相比能够充分代表术中肌肉松弛。
前瞻性观察性研究。
2016 年 2 月至 2018 年 12 月,瑞士苏黎世巴尔格里斯特大学医院的单中心研究。
二十名计划接受择期腰椎融合术的患者在书面知情同意后,前瞻性纳入本研究。
为了评估具有中时效非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂罗库溴铵的神经肌肉阻滞(NMB),在手 TOF(拇指内收肌)和脚 TOF(踇长屈肌)监测下,以及在上肢和下肢的肌肉运动诱发电位(MMEPs)监测下,在全身麻醉下进行手术前评估。在基线测量后,用罗库溴铵进行肌肉松弛,直到脊柱外科医生观察到足以进行手术干预的充分松弛。此时,通过 TOF 和 MMEP 评估 NMB。
主要结果是确定罗库溴铵对肌肉松弛的不同影响,比较手和脚 TOF 与通过 MMEP 评估的脊柱旁肌肉。
手 TOF 对 NMB 的抵抗力更强,恢复时间更短。当比较 MMEPs 时,肌肉松弛首先发生在髋外展肌,然后是脊柱旁和三角肌。对 NMB 最具抵抗力的肌肉是小趾展肌。直接比较表明,同时从上肢和下肢以及脊柱旁肌肉记录的各种肌肉的重复 MMEPs 反映了与 TOF 测试相似的肌肉松弛。
在手脊柱手术中,手 TOF 比脚 TOF 更能评估肌肉松弛。手 TOF 不仅充分代表了脊柱旁肌肉的松弛程度,而且还充分代表了所有需要良好手术条件的矫形外科手术部位的神经肌肉阻滞程度。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03318718)。