Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 26;12:e17154. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17154. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to investigate the clinical viability of utilizing the flexor hallucis brevis as an alternative site for neuromuscular monitoring compared to the conventional adductor pollicis. Patients were recruited from three medical centers. Cis-atracurium was administered, and two monitors were employed independently to assess neuromuscular blockade of the adductor pollicis and the ipsilateral flexor hallucis brevis, following a train of four (TOF) pattern until TOF ratios exceeded 0.9 or until the conclusion of surgery. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in onset time, duration of no-twitch response, spontaneous recovery time, and total monitoring time between the two sites, with mean differences of -53.54 s, -2.49, 3.22, and 5.89 min, respectively ( < 0.001).The posterior tibial nerve-flexor hallucis brevis pathway presents a promising alternative for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia maintenance. Further investigation is warranted to explore its utility in anesthesia induction and recovery. : The trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (20/11/2018, ChiCTR1800019651).
本研究旨在探讨在临床中使用比目鱼肌作为神经肌肉监测的替代部位的可行性,与传统的内收肌相比。患者从三个医疗中心招募。给予顺式阿曲库铵,并采用两种监测器独立评估内收肌和对侧比目鱼肌的神经肌肉阻滞,采用四脉冲(TOF)模式,直到 TOF 比值超过 0.9 或手术结束。统计分析显示,两个部位的起始时间、无抽搐反应持续时间、自发恢复时间和总监测时间存在显著差异,平均差异分别为-53.54 秒、-2.49、3.22 和 5.89 分钟(<0.001)。胫后神经-比目鱼肌通路为麻醉维持期间的神经肌肉监测提供了有前途的替代方案。需要进一步研究探讨其在麻醉诱导和恢复中的应用。试验在中国临床试验注册中心(www.chictr.org.cn)注册(2018 年 11 月 20 日,ChiCTR1800019651)。