Zhejiang Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0243161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243161. eCollection 2020.
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a severe form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and its early diagnosis is very difficult leading to present with severe disability or die. The current study aimed to assess the accuracy of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) for TBM, and to identify a new test for the early diagnosis of TBM.
We searched for articles published in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data up to June 30, 2020 for studies that assessed the efficacy of mNGS for the diagnosis of TBM. Then, the accuracy between mNGS and a composite reference standard (CRS) in these articles was compared using the meta-analysis approach.
Four independent studies with 342 samples comparing mNGS and a CRS were included in this study. The sensitivity of mNGS for TBM diagnosis ranged from 27% to 84%. The combined sensitivity of mNGS was 61%, and the I2 value was 92%. Moreover, the specificity of mNGS for TBM diagnosis ranged from 96% to 100%. The combined specificity of mNGS was 98%, and the I2 value was 74%. The heterogeneity between studies in terms of sensitivity and specificity was significant. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) of mNGS for TBM was 0.98.
The sensitivity of mNGS for TBM diagnosis was moderate. Furthermore, the specificity was extremely high, and the AUC of the SROC indicated a very good diagnostic efficacy. mNGS could be used as an early diagnostic method for TBM, however, the results should be treated with caution for the heterogeneity between studies was extremely significant.
INPLASY202070100.
结核性脑膜炎(TBM)是一种严重的肺外结核病,其早期诊断非常困难,导致严重残疾或死亡。本研究旨在评估宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在 TBM 中的准确性,并寻找新的 TBM 早期诊断测试方法。
我们在 Embase、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、中国知网和万方数据中检索了截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日发表的评估 mNGS 对 TBM 诊断效果的文章。然后,使用荟萃分析方法比较了这些文章中 mNGS 与综合参考标准(CRS)的准确性。
本研究纳入了 4 项独立的研究,共 342 例样本,比较了 mNGS 和 CRS。mNGS 对 TBM 诊断的敏感性范围为 27%至 84%。mNGS 的合并敏感性为 61%,I²值为 92%。此外,mNGS 对 TBM 诊断的特异性范围为 96%至 100%。mNGS 的合并特异性为 98%,I²值为 74%。在敏感性和特异性方面,研究之间存在显著的异质性。mNGS 对 TBM 的 SROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.98。
mNGS 对 TBM 诊断的敏感性中等。此外,特异性极高,SROC 的 AUC 表明诊断效果非常好。mNGS 可作为 TBM 的早期诊断方法,但由于研究之间的异质性非常显著,结果应谨慎对待。
INPLASY202070100。