Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tianjin Translational Genomics Center, BGI-Tianjin, Binhai Genomics Institute, BGI-Shenzhen, Tianjin, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Oct 18;9:351. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00351. eCollection 2019.
Tuberculosis (TB) is now the leading cause of death from infectious disease. Rapid screening and diagnostic methods for TB are urgently required. Rapid development of metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in recent years showed promising and satisfying application of mNGS in several kinds of infectious diseases. However, research directly evaluating the ability of mNGS in TB infection is still scarce. We conducted an adult prospective study in mainland China to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mNGS for detection of complex (MTB) in multiple forms of direct clinical samples compared with GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert), traditional diagnostic methods, and the clinical final diagnosis. Of 123 patients presenting with suspected active TB infection between June 1, 2017, and May 21, 2018, 105 patients underwent synchronous tuberculous testing with culture, Xpert, and mNGS on direct clinical samples including sputum, cerebrospinal fluids, pus, etc. During follow-up, 45 of 105 participants had clinical final diagnosis of active TB infection, including 13 pulmonary TB cases and 32 extrapulmonary TB cases. Compared to clinical final diagnosis, mNGS produced a sensitivity of 44% for all active TB cases, which was similar to Xpert (42%) but much higher than conventional methods (29%). With only one false-positive result, mNGS had a specificity of 98% in our study. mNGS yielded significantly much higher sensitivity in pre-treatment samples (76%) than post-treatment ones (31%) ( = 0.005), which was also true for Xpert and conventional methods. Combining Xpert and mNGS together, the study identified 27 of 45 active TB cases (60%), including all 13 conventional method-identified cases, and the result reached statistical significance compared to conventional methods (McNemar-test < 0.001). mNGS had a similar diagnostic ability of MTB compared with Xpert and showed potential for a variety of clinical samples. Combined mNGS and Xpert showed an overall superior advantage over conventional methods and significantly improved the etiology diagnosis of both MTB and other pathogens. The result that anti-TB treatment significantly reduced diagnostic efficacy of culture, Xpert, and mNGS highlighted the importance of collecting samples before empirical treatment.
结核病(TB)现在是传染病死亡的主要原因。迫切需要快速筛查和诊断结核病的方法。近年来宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)的快速发展表明,mNGS 在几种传染病中的应用具有很大的潜力和令人满意的结果。然而,直接评估 mNGS 在结核病感染中的能力的研究仍然很少。我们在中国内地进行了一项成人前瞻性研究,以评估 mNGS 检测多种直接临床样本中复杂(MTB)的诊断性能,与 GeneXpert MTB/RIF 测定(Xpert)、传统诊断方法和临床最终诊断进行比较。2017 年 6 月 1 日至 2018 年 5 月 21 日期间,有 123 名疑似活动性结核病感染的患者入组,105 名患者在直接临床样本(包括痰、脑脊液、脓液等)上同时进行结核检测,包括培养、Xpert 和 mNGS。在随访期间,105 名参与者中有 45 名有活动性结核病感染的临床最终诊断,包括 13 例肺结核和 32 例肺外结核。与临床最终诊断相比,mNGS 对所有活动性结核病病例的敏感性为 44%,与 Xpert(42%)相似,但明显高于传统方法(29%)。在本研究中,mNGS 只有一个假阳性结果,特异性为 98%。mNGS 在治疗前样本中的敏感性(76%)明显高于治疗后样本(31%)(=0.005),Xpert 和传统方法也是如此。将 Xpert 和 mNGS 结合起来,研究确定了 45 例活动性结核病病例中的 27 例(60%),包括所有 13 例常规方法确定的病例,与常规方法相比,这一结果具有统计学意义(McNemar 检验 <0.001)。mNGS 对 MTB 的诊断能力与 Xpert 相似,并显示出对各种临床样本的潜力。mNGS 和 Xpert 的联合应用总体上优于传统方法,显著提高了 MTB 和其他病原体的病因诊断。抗结核治疗显著降低了培养、Xpert 和 mNGS 的诊断效果的结果突出了在经验性治疗前采集样本的重要性。