Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jan;134:109424. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109424. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
Follow-up of aortic aneurysms by computed tomography (CT) is crucial to balance the risks of treatment and rupture. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted radiology reporting promises time savings and reduced inter-reader variabilities.
The influence of AI assistance on the efficiency and accuracy of aortic aneurysm reporting according to the AHA / ESC guidelines was quantified based on 324 AI measurements and 1944 radiological measurements: 18 aortic aneurysm patients, each with two CT scans (arterial contrast phase, electrocardiogram-gated) with an interval of at least six months have been included. One board-certified radiologist and two residents (8/4/2 years of experience in vascular imaging) independently assessed aortic diameters at nine landmark positions. Aneurysm extensions were compared with original CT reports. After three weeks washout period, CTs were re-assessed, based on graphically illustrated AI measurements.
Time-consuming guideline-compliant aortic measurements revealed additional affections of the root / arch for 80 % of aneurysms that had initially been reported to be limited to the ascending aorta. AI assistance reduced mean reporting time by 63 % from 13:01 to 04:46 min including manual corrections of AI measurements (performed for 33.6 % of all measurements with predominance at the sinuses of Vasalva). AI assistance reduced total diameter inter-reader variability by 42.5 % (0.42 / 1.16 mm with / without AI assistance, mean of all patients and landmark positions, significant reduction for 6 out of 9 measuring positions). Conventional and AI-assisted quantification aneurysm progress varied to small extent (mean of 0.75 mm over all patients / landmark positions) not significantly exceeding radiologist's inter-reader variabilities.
Guideline-compliant aorta measurement is crucial to report detailed aneurysm extension which might affect the strategy of interventional repair. AI assistance promises improved reporting efficiency and has high potential to reduce radiologist's inter-reader variabilities that can hamper diagnostic follow-up accuracy.
The time-consuming guideline-compliant aorta aneurysm assessment is crucial to report aneurysm extension in detail; AI-assisted measurement reduces reporting time, improves extension evaluation and reduces inter-reader variability.
通过计算机断层扫描(CT)对主动脉瘤进行随访对于平衡治疗和破裂的风险至关重要。人工智能(AI)辅助放射学报告有望节省时间并降低读者间的差异。
根据 AHA / ESC 指南,基于 324 项 AI 测量值和 1944 项放射学测量值,量化了 AI 辅助对主动脉瘤报告的效率和准确性的影响:共纳入 18 名主动脉瘤患者,每位患者均进行两次 CT 扫描(动脉造影期,心电图门控),两次扫描至少间隔六个月。一位经过董事会认证的放射科医生和两位住院医师(血管成像 8/4/2 年经验)分别在九个标志性位置独立评估主动脉直径。比较了动脉瘤的延伸与原始 CT 报告。在三周的洗脱期后,根据图形化的 AI 测量值重新评估 CT。
耗时的符合指南的主动脉测量显示,最初报告为仅局限于升主动脉的动脉瘤中有 80%存在根部/弓部的额外受累。AI 辅助将报告时间从 13:01 缩短至 04:46 分钟,包括对 AI 测量值的手动校正(所有测量值中有 33.6%需要进行校正,主要在瓦萨尔瓦窦处)。AI 辅助将总直径读者间的差异降低了 42.5%(有/无 AI 辅助时为 0.42/1.16mm,所有患者和所有测量位置的平均值,6 个测量位置有显著降低)。常规和 AI 辅助的动脉瘤进展定量变化很小(所有患者/所有测量位置的平均值为 0.75mm),未显著超过放射科医生的读者间差异。
符合指南的主动脉测量对于报告详细的动脉瘤延伸至关重要,这可能会影响介入修复的策略。AI 辅助有望提高报告效率,并具有降低放射科医生读者间差异的高潜力,这可能会影响诊断随访的准确性。
耗时的符合指南的主动脉瘤评估对于详细报告动脉瘤延伸至关重要;AI 辅助测量可减少报告时间,改善延伸评估并降低读者间差异。