Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, IKM Building 2nd Floor, Jl. Farmako, Sekip Utara, 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
School of Rural Health, Monash University, 26 Mercy Street, Bendigo, VIC, 3550, Australia.
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Dec 1;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00533-4.
More than 60% of the world's rural population live in the Asia-Pacific region. Of these, more than 90% reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Asia-Pacific LMICs rural populations are more impoverished and have poorer access to medical care, placing them at greater risk of poor health outcomes. Understanding factors associated with doctors working in rural areas is imperative in identifying effective strategies to improve rural medical workforce supply in Asia-Pacific LMICs.
We performed a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature from Asia-Pacific LMICs (1999 to 2019), searching major online databases and web-based resources. The literature was synthesized based on the World Health Organization Global Policy Recommendation categories for increasing access to rural health workers.
Seventy-one articles from 12 LMICs were included. Most were about educational factors (82%), followed by personal and professional support (57%), financial incentives (45%), regulatory (20%), and health systems (13%). Rural background showed strong association with both rural preference and actual work in most studies. There was a paucity in literature on the effect of rural pathway in medical education such as rural-oriented curricula, rural clerkships and internship; however, when combined with other educational and regulatory interventions, they were effective. An additional area, atop of the WHO categories was identified, relating to health system factors, such as governance, health service organization and financing. Studies generally were of low quality-frequently overlooking potential confounding variables, such as respondents' demographic characteristics and career stage-and 39% did not clearly define 'rural'.
This review is consistent with, and extends, most of the existing evidence on effective strategies to recruit and retain rural doctors while specifically informing the range of evidence within the Asia-Pacific LMIC context. Evidence, though confined to 12 countries, is drawn from 20 years' research about a wide range of factors that can be targeted to strengthen strategies to increase rural medical workforce supply in Asia-Pacific LMICs. Multi-faceted approaches were evident, including selecting more students into medical school with a rural background, increasing public-funded universities, in combination with rural-focused education and rural scholarships, workplace and rural living support and ensuring an appropriately financed rural health system. The review identifies the need for more studies in a broader range of Asia-Pacific countries, which expand on all strategy areas, define rural clearly, use multivariate analyses, and test how various strategies relate to doctor's career stages.
世界上超过 60%的农村人口居住在亚太地区。其中,超过 90%的人生活在中低收入国家(LMICs)。亚太地区 LMICs 的农村人口更加贫困,获得医疗保健的机会更少,因此他们的健康状况更差。了解在农村地区工作的医生相关因素对于确定在亚太地区 LMICs 中提高农村医疗劳动力供应的有效策略至关重要。
我们对来自亚太地区 LMICs(1999 年至 2019 年)的同行评审和灰色文献进行了范围综述,检索了主要在线数据库和网络资源。根据世界卫生组织增加农村卫生工作者获得途径的全球政策建议类别对文献进行了综合分析。
来自 12 个 LMIC 的 71 篇文章被纳入研究。大多数文章涉及教育因素(82%),其次是个人和专业支持(57%)、财政激励(45%)、监管(20%)和卫生系统(13%)。在大多数研究中,农村背景与农村偏好和实际工作都有很强的关联。在医学教育中的农村途径方面,如农村定向课程、农村实习和实习,文献很少,但当与其他教育和监管干预措施相结合时,它们是有效的。除了世界卫生组织类别之外,还确定了一个与卫生系统因素相关的额外领域,例如治理、卫生服务组织和融资。研究的总体质量较低-经常忽略潜在的混杂变量,例如受访者的人口统计学特征和职业阶段-并且 39%的研究没有清楚地定义“农村”。
本综述与大多数关于招聘和留住农村医生的有效策略的现有证据一致,并在具体范围内提供了亚太地区 LMIC 背景下的广泛证据。尽管证据仅限于 12 个国家,但来自 20 年来关于一系列可以针对加强策略以增加亚太地区 LMIC 农村医疗劳动力供应的因素的研究。明显的是,多方面的方法包括选择更多具有农村背景的学生进入医学院、增加公立大学,同时结合农村教育和农村奖学金、工作场所和农村生活支持,并确保农村卫生系统有适当的资金。该综述确定了在更广泛的亚太国家进行更多研究的需求,这些研究将扩大所有战略领域,明确界定农村,使用多元分析,并检验各种策略与医生的职业阶段的关系。