Suppr超能文献

分析柬埔寨、中国和越南吸引和留住农村卫生工作者的策略及其结果的影响因素。

Analysis of strategies to attract and retain rural health workers in Cambodia, China, and Vietnam and context influencing their outcomes.

机构信息

Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.

Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, United States of America.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jan 7;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0340-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many Asia-Pacific countries are experiencing rapid changes in socio-economic and health system development. This study aims to describe the strategies supporting rural health worker attraction and retention in Cambodia, China, and Vietnam and explore the context influencing their outcomes.

METHODS

This paper is a policy analysis based on key informant interviews with stakeholders about a rural province of Cambodia, China, and Vietnam, coupled with a broad review of the literature.

RESULTS

Cambodia, China, and Vietnam have implemented medical education, provided financial incentives, and provided personal and professional support to attract and retain rural health workers. More socio-economic development was related to a wider range of interventions and their scope. The health system context influenced the outcomes. Increased autonomy of public hospitals attracted more health workers from rural primary health facilities in China and Vietnam. Health financing policies for universal health coverage in China and Vietnam have increased the utilization of health services. Subsidies for poor people to access health services in Cambodia have provided financial incentives to retain rural health workers. However, the dismantling of the referral system in China and Vietnam has resulted in a high rate of health workers moving from primary health facilities to higher-level hospitals while clear definition of primary healthcare package in Cambodia guided its planning of primary health workforce. The prosperous private health sector in Cambodia and Vietnam attracted more health workers from rural primary health facilities, impeded implementation and determined effectiveness of financial incentives.

CONCLUSIONS

Socio-economic and health system reforms including health financing, public hospital autonomy, abolition of referral system and prosperous private sector have both positive and negative impacts on the design, implementation, and effectiveness of interventions to attract and retain rural health workers. Interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural and remote areas need to be considered within overall health system reform.

摘要

背景

许多亚太国家正在经历社会经济和卫生系统发展的快速变化。本研究旨在描述支持柬埔寨、中国和越南农村卫生工作者吸引力和留用的战略,并探讨影响其结果的背景因素。

方法

本文是一项基于对柬埔寨、中国和越南农村省份的利益攸关方进行关键知情人访谈的政策分析,同时对文献进行了广泛回顾。

结果

柬埔寨、中国和越南实施了医学教育、提供财政激励以及提供个人和专业支持,以吸引和留住农村卫生工作者。更多的社会经济发展与更广泛的干预措施及其范围有关。卫生系统背景影响了结果。公立医院自主权的增加吸引了更多的卫生工作者从中国和越南的农村初级卫生保健机构流动。中国和越南的全民健康覆盖卫生融资政策增加了卫生服务的利用。柬埔寨为贫困人口获得卫生服务提供补贴,为留住农村卫生工作者提供了财政激励。然而,中国和越南转诊系统的废除导致了从初级卫生保健机构向更高层次医院流动的卫生工作者比例较高,而柬埔寨明确界定初级医疗保健包则指导了其初级卫生人力规划。柬埔寨和越南繁荣的私营卫生部门吸引了更多的农村初级卫生保健机构的卫生工作者,阻碍了财政激励措施的实施和有效性的确定。

结论

包括卫生融资、公立医院自主权、废除转诊系统和繁荣的私营部门在内的社会经济和卫生系统改革,对吸引和留住农村卫生工作者的干预措施的设计、实施和有效性都有积极和消极的影响。吸引和留住农村和偏远地区卫生工作者的干预措施需要在整个卫生系统改革中考虑。

相似文献

5
Transformation of health care in China.中国医疗保健的变革。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Apr 5;310(14):932-6. doi: 10.1056/nejm198404053101428.
8
[Tuberculosis in Asia].[亚洲的结核病]
Kekkaku. 2002 Oct;77(10):693-7.

引用本文的文献

3
Disparities in access to cancer diagnostics in ASEAN member countries.东盟成员国在癌症诊断可及性方面的差异。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jan 6;32:100667. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100667. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
What Drove the Cycles of Chinese Health System Reforms?是什么推动了中国卫生系统改革的循环?
Health Syst Reform. 2015 Jan 2;1(1):52-61. doi: 10.4161/23288604.2014.995005.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验