Kunnuru Supreeth Kumar Reddy, Thiyagarajan Manuneethimaran, Martin Daniel Jovita, Singh K Balaji
General Surgery Department, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai 600116, India.
Medical Oncology Department, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai 600116, India.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2020 Nov 20;12:259-266. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S277588. eCollection 2020.
To assess the effectiveness of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on the clinical and pathological response in locally advanced breast cancer. To compare molecular subtypes of breast cancer with response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
This was a prospective study on patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma for a 3-year period. A total of 60 patients who presented with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty patients were treated with the 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) schedule, 16 patients were treated with Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC), and four patients were treated with oral cyclophosphamide, intravenous methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). Taxol was added in all node-positive cases, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and Her 2 positive cases. The clinical response was assessed with RECIST criteria after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The response was compared with molecular subtypes of carcinoma breast and receptor status individually.
A total of 60 female patients receiving primary chemotherapy for locally advanced breast malignancy were studied. The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 44 years (range=24-73). In terms of menopausal status, 25 (42%) patients were pre-menopausal and 35 (58%) patients were post-menopausal. Histological classification showed invasive ductal carcinoma in 72% of patients, invasive lobular carcinoma in 15% of patients, and other types including mixed patterns in 13% of patients. Among 60 patients, 16 patients (26.6%) had clinically complete remission (cCR), 30 patients (50%) had partial remission, eight patients (13.3%) had stable disease, and six patients (10%) had progressive disease. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 46 (76.6%) patient underwent Modified radical mastectomy surgery. Target therapy was given for Her2 neu patients after surgery. Hormonal therapy was added to hormone ER PR positive cases postoperatively. Eight patients (13.3%) among this operated cases attained complete pathological response.
Preoperative chemotherapy downstages the primary tumors and axillary metastasis in patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. Comparison of molecular subtypes with chemotherapy response is a better way to find out the predictors of response to chemotherapy.
评估新辅助化疗的有效性及其对局部晚期乳腺癌临床和病理反应的影响。比较乳腺癌分子亚型与新辅助化疗反应。
这是一项对接受乳腺癌新辅助化疗3年的患者进行的前瞻性研究。共有60例局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)患者接受了新辅助化疗。40例患者采用氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星和环磷酰胺(FEC)方案治疗,16例患者采用阿霉素和环磷酰胺(AC)治疗,4例患者采用口服环磷酰胺、静脉注射甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶(CMF)治疗。所有淋巴结阳性病例、三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和Her 2阳性病例均加用紫杉醇。新辅助化疗后根据RECIST标准评估临床反应。将反应分别与乳腺癌分子亚型和受体状态进行比较。
共研究了60例接受局部晚期乳腺恶性肿瘤一线化疗的女性患者。患者诊断时的中位年龄为44岁(范围=24 - 73岁)。在绝经状态方面,25例(42%)患者为绝经前,35例(58%)患者为绝经后。组织学分类显示,72%的患者为浸润性导管癌,15%的患者为浸润性小叶癌,13%的患者为其他类型,包括混合模式。60例患者中,16例(26.6%)临床完全缓解(cCR),30例(50%)部分缓解,8例(13.3%)疾病稳定,6例(10%)疾病进展。新辅助化疗后,46例(76.6%)患者接受了改良根治性乳房切除术。术后对Her2 neu患者给予靶向治疗。激素ER PR阳性病例术后加用激素治疗。在这些手术病例中,8例(13.3%)达到完全病理缓解。
术前化疗可使局部晚期乳腺癌患者的原发肿瘤和腋窝转移降期。比较分子亚型与化疗反应是找出化疗反应预测指标的更好方法。