Moses Aghin, Ganesan Lambodaran, Shankar Sathya, Hariharan Annapoorni
Post graduate student. Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai.
MDS, Associate Professor. Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Nov 1;12(11):e1039-e1044. doi: 10.4317/jced.57569. eCollection 2020 Nov.
The bond strength between the zirconia core and ceramic veneer is the weakest component in the layered structure. Delamination of veneering ceramic is reported as one of the most frequent problems associated with Veneered Zirconia restorations. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of lithium di silicate porcelain to that of feldspathic porcelain on a zirconia Substrate.
Two groups (group A and B) of zirconia blocks with each group having 20 samples were fabricated according to Schmitz Schulmeyer method. Group A (n =20 ) samples were veneered with feldspathic veneering porcelain and Group B (n=20) samples were veneered with heat pressed lithium disilicate ceramic. The fabricated samples were then evaluated for shear bond strength in Universal Testing Machine. The values were then statistically analyzed using independent sample t-test.
Results of the current study showed that mean shear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain 11.40±1.29 MPa is comparatively lower than the mean shear bond strength of the lithium disilicate group 18.81±1.76 MPa. The statistical analysis indicated that ( value<0.01) there is a statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength between the two groups.
The heat pressed lithium disilicate veneering materials has a better shear bond strength compared to feldspathic veneering ceramic material when layered to a zirconia core and it can be used as a viable alternative material to feldspathic porcelain layering material in bilayered zirconia restorations. Zirconia, bilayered ceramics, lithium disilicate , shear bond strength, ceramic chipping.
氧化锆核与陶瓷贴面之间的粘结强度是分层结构中最薄弱的环节。据报道,贴面陶瓷分层是氧化锆贴面修复中最常见的问题之一。本研究的目的是比较二硅酸锂瓷与长石瓷在氧化锆基底上的剪切粘结强度。
根据施密茨·舒尔迈耶方法制作两组(A组和B组)氧化锆块,每组20个样本。A组(n = 20)样本用长石贴面瓷贴面,B组(n = 20)样本用热压二硅酸锂陶瓷贴面。然后在万能试验机上对制作好的样本进行剪切粘结强度评估。然后使用独立样本t检验对这些值进行统计分析。
本研究结果表明,长石瓷的平均剪切粘结强度为11.40±1.29MPa,相对低于二硅酸锂组的平均剪切粘结强度18.81±1.76MPa。统计分析表明(P值<0.01)两组之间的剪切粘结强度存在统计学显著差异。
热压二硅酸锂贴面材料与长石贴面陶瓷材料相比,在与氧化锆核分层时具有更好的剪切粘结强度,并且它可以作为双层氧化锆修复中长石瓷分层材料的可行替代材料。氧化锆、双层陶瓷、二硅酸锂、剪切粘结强度、陶瓷崩裂。