Suppr超能文献

年轻成年人在不同温度下睫状肌跳动频率的比较。

Comparison of ciliary beat frequencies at different temperatures in young adults.

作者信息

Nikolaizik Wilfried, Hahn Jana, Bauck Monika, Weber Stefanie

机构信息

Dept of Pediatric Chest Medicine, Children's Hospital, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2020 Nov 10;6(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00477-2020. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Direct visualisation of ciliary beat pattern (CBP) and ciliary beat frequency (CBF) has been recommended as the first-line diagnostic test in patients suspected of having primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). However, the test procedure is not yet completely standardised, and centres measure the CBF at different temperatures.

OBJECTIVES

It was the aim of the study to compare CBF at different temperatures, to establish normative values, to check for age dependency and to measure the temperature on the nasal mucosa of the participants.

METHODS

High-speed video-microscopy analysis with a Sisson-Ammons Video Analysis (SAVA) system was used to determine CBP and CBF in the participants.

MEASUREMENTS

Nasal brushings were taken and CBF was measured in randomised order at three temperatures: 25°C, 32°C and 37°C.

MAIN RESULTS

In total, 100 healthy young adults (74 female, 26 male), aged 20.2-31.9 years, were included in the study. We found a highly significant difference among the groups: the median CBF was 7.0 Hz at 25°C, 7.6 Hz at 32°C and 8.0 Hz at 37°C. The maximum time period was 65 min and did not differ significantly. However, CBF was significantly higher when the cilia were kept at a higher temperature before the measurements were made. We found no correlation between CBF and the age of the participants. The median nasal mucosal temperature in our study participants was 30.2°C (range 24.7-35.8°C) comparable to the 30.2-34.4°C described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The most appropriate temperature at which to measure CBF is 32°C. In our study, with 95% confidence for this temperature the CBF was between 6.3 and 9.0 Hz.

摘要

原理

对于疑似患有原发性纤毛运动障碍(PCD)的患者,推荐直接观察纤毛摆动模式(CBP)和纤毛摆动频率(CBF)作为一线诊断测试。然而,测试程序尚未完全标准化,各中心在不同温度下测量CBF。

目的

本研究旨在比较不同温度下的CBF,建立正常值,检查年龄依赖性,并测量参与者鼻黏膜的温度。

方法

使用带有西森-安蒙斯视频分析(SAVA)系统的高速视频显微镜分析来确定参与者的CBP和CBF。

测量

采集鼻拭子,并在三个温度下以随机顺序测量CBF:25°C、32°C和37°C。

主要结果

本研究共纳入100名健康年轻成年人(74名女性,26名男性),年龄在20.2至31.9岁之间。我们发现各组之间存在高度显著差异:25°C时CBF中位数为7.0Hz,32°C时为7.6Hz,37°C时为8.0Hz。最长时间段为65分钟,无显著差异。然而,在测量前将纤毛保持在较高温度时,CBF显著更高。我们发现CBF与参与者年龄之间无相关性。本研究参与者的鼻黏膜温度中位数为30.2°C(范围24.7 - 35.8°C),与文献中描述的30.2 - 34.4°C相当。

结论

测量CBF的最合适温度为32°C。在我们的研究中,对于该温度,CBF在6.3至9.0Hz之间的置信度为95%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/162d/7682707/8a4840190084/00477-2020.01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验