Suppr超能文献

一种使用iPhone和MATLAB测量纤毛摆动频率的低成本方法:兔实验研究

A Low-Cost Method of Ciliary Beat Frequency Measurement Using iPhone and MATLAB: Rabbit Study.

作者信息

Chen Jason J, Lemieux Bryan T, Wong Brian J F

机构信息

Beckman Laser Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

Beckman Laser Institute, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, USA Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, USA

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):252-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599816640219. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine ciliary beat frequency (CBF) using a consumer-grade cellphone camera and MATLAB and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective animal study.

SETTING

Academic otolaryngology department research laboratory.

METHODS

Five ex vivo tracheal samples were extracted from 3 freshly euthanized (<3 hours postmortem) New Zealand white rabbits and incubated for 30 minutes in buffer at 23°C, buffer at 37°C, or 10% formalin at 23°C. Samples were sectioned transversely and observed under a phase-contrast microscope. Cilia movement was recorded through the eyepiece using an iPhone 6 at 240 frames per second (fps). Through MATLAB programming, the video of the 23°C sample was downsampled to 120, 60, and 30 fps, and Fourier analysis was performed on videos of all frame rates and conditions to determine CBF. CBF of the 23°C sample was also calculated manually frame by frame for verification.

RESULTS

Recorded at 240 fps, the CBF at 23°C was 5.03 ± 0.4 Hz, and the CBF at 37°C was 9.08 ± 0.49 Hz (P < .001). The sample with 10% formalin did not display any data beyond DC noise. Compared with 240 fps, the means of other frame rates/methods (120, 60, 30 fps; manual counting) at 23°C all showed no statistical difference (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference between CBF measured via visual inspection and that analyzed by the developed program. Furthermore, all tested acquisition rates are shown to be effective, providing a fast and inexpensive alternative to current CBF measurement protocols.

摘要

目的

(1)使用消费级手机摄像头和MATLAB确定纤毛摆动频率(CBF),(2)评估所提出方法的有效性和准确性。

研究设计

前瞻性动物研究。

研究地点

学术性耳鼻喉科研究实验室。

方法

从3只刚安乐死(死后<3小时)的新西兰白兔身上提取5个离体气管样本,分别在23°C缓冲液、37°C缓冲液或23°C的10%福尔马林中孵育30分钟。样本横向切片后在相差显微镜下观察。使用iPhone 6以每秒240帧(fps)的速度通过目镜记录纤毛运动。通过MATLAB编程,将23°C样本的视频下采样至120、60和30 fps,并对所有帧率和条件下的视频进行傅里叶分析以确定CBF。还逐帧手动计算23°C样本的CBF以进行验证。

结果

在240 fps记录时,23°C时的CBF为5.03±0.4 Hz,37°C时的CBF为9.08±0.49 Hz(P<.001)。10%福尔马林处理的样本除直流噪声外未显示任何数据。与240 fps相比,23°C时其他帧率/方法(120、60、30 fps;手动计数)的平均值均无统计学差异(P>.05)。

结论

通过目视检查测量的CBF与所开发程序分析的CBF之间无显著差异。此外,所有测试的采集速率均有效,为当前CBF测量方案提供了一种快速且廉价的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验