• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留子宫的骶骨棘韧带固定术可降低盆腔器官脱垂解剖学复发的风险。

Sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation reduces the risk of anatomical recurrence in pelvic organ prolapse.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital, Xiamen, China.

出版信息

Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Apr;13(2):249-256. doi: 10.1111/luts.12361. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1111/luts.12361
PMID:33263221
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and whether uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate.

METHODS

The medical records of 82 patients who received SSLF in a single medical center were reviewed retrospectively. Anatomical recurrence was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification stage 2 or higher in any compartment. The primary outcome was intergroup analysis for uterine preservation and concomitant hysterectomy patients. The secondary outcomes were anatomical recurrence risk factors and the incidence of adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for demographic differences between groups.

RESULTS

The anatomical recurrence rate was 19.5%, and the retreatment rate was 11.0% (mean follow-up duration: 22.9 months). Cystocele was the most common recurrent compartment (17.1%). The uterine preservation group (n = 66) was younger, had lower parity, and had fewer stage 3 to 4 cystoceles and uterine prolapses than the concomitant hysterectomy group (n = 16). Shorter operation times (99.4 minutes vs 153.7 minutes, P = .002) and lower anatomical recurrence rates (11.5% vs 45.5%, P = .039) were found in the uterine preservation group before and after PSM. Previous pelvic organ prolapse surgery (hazard ratio 3.14) and concomitant hysterectomy (hazard ratio 4.08) were identified as risk factors for anatomical recurrence. The most common adverse event was buttock pain (14.6%), which resolved spontaneously within 4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

SSLF is an effective surgical method using native tissue for pelvic reconstruction. Compared with concomitant hysterectomy, SSLF with uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨骶骨固定术(SSLF)的有效性,以及保留子宫是否能降低解剖复发率。

方法

回顾性分析了在一家医疗中心接受 SSLF 的 82 例患者的病历。解剖学复发定义为任何部位的盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)分期 2 级或更高级别。主要结局是保留子宫和同时行子宫切除术患者的组间分析。次要结局是解剖复发的危险因素和不良事件的发生率。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)调整组间的人口统计学差异。

结果

解剖学复发率为 19.5%,再治疗率为 11.0%(平均随访时间:22.9 个月)。膀胱膨出是最常见的复发部位(17.1%)。保留子宫组(n=66)的年龄更小,产次更少,3 至 4 级膀胱膨出和子宫脱垂的比例也低于同时行子宫切除术组(n=16)。保留子宫组的手术时间更短(99.4 分钟比 153.7 分钟,P=0.002),解剖学复发率更低(11.5%比 45.5%,P=0.039),这一差异在 PSM 前后均存在。既往盆腔器官脱垂手术(风险比 3.14)和同时行子宫切除术(风险比 4.08)是解剖学复发的危险因素。最常见的不良事件是臀部疼痛(14.6%),4 周内可自行缓解。

结论

SSLF 是一种使用原生组织进行盆腔重建的有效手术方法。与同时行子宫切除术相比,保留子宫的 SSLF 可降低解剖学复发率。

相似文献

1
Sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation reduces the risk of anatomical recurrence in pelvic organ prolapse.保留子宫的骶骨棘韧带固定术可降低盆腔器官脱垂解剖学复发的风险。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021 Apr;13(2):249-256. doi: 10.1111/luts.12361. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.经骶骨固定术或阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):252.e1-252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
3
Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.子宫保留对骶棘韧带固定治疗盆腔器官脱垂的长期主观结局的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
5
Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.盆腔器官脱垂手术后的解剖学结果:子宫保留与子宫切除术的比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Dec;183:33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
6
[Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].[使用传统器械行骶棘韧带固定术治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期盆腔器官脱垂结局的前瞻性队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):369-373. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.003.
7
Anatomical and functional outcomes after hysterectomy and bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for stage IV uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective case series.子宫切除术和双侧骶棘韧带固定术治疗 IV 期子宫阴道脱垂的解剖和功能结果:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
BMC Urol. 2020 Aug 19;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00694-3.
8
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
9
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.骶棘韧带子宫固定术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊的阴道子宫切除术治疗2期及以上子宫脱垂女性的多中心随机非劣效性试验
BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.
10
Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.手术干预治疗子宫脱垂和阴道顶端脱垂:两项 VUE RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(13):1-220. doi: 10.3310/hta24130.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Effect of Uterosacral and Cardinal Ligament Fixation versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.经阴道子宫穹窿脱垂行骶骨固定与主骶韧带固定的临床效果比较:一项回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2023 Jun 3;2023:1489928. doi: 10.1155/2023/1489928. eCollection 2023.
2
Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series.病例报告:经阴道单孔腹膜外腹腔镜骶棘韧带固定术治疗顶端脱垂:单中心病例系列
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 29;10:1066622. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622. eCollection 2023.
3
Single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension the natural vaginal cavity (SvNOTES) for pelvic prolapse: The first feasibility study.
单孔腹腔镜骶棘韧带悬吊术:经自然阴道腔道(SvNOTES)治疗盆腔器官脱垂的初步可行性研究
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 18;9:911553. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.911553. eCollection 2022.