University of Bologna.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma.
Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 30;91(12-S):e2020013. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i12-S.10859.
Appropriateness is particularly relevant in palliative care, an area in which it is essential to question the real need for treatments. Few studies explored the perception of appropriateness by professionals in pediatric palliative care, revealing the conflict sometimes faced when confronted with the uncertainty of prognosis and end-of-life decisions.
The objective of this study is firstly to investigate the perception that doctors, nurses and psychologists, operating in Italian pediatric hospices, have of the appropriateness of the care they provide. Secondly, to understand what repercussions the perception of non-appropriateness has at individual and team level.
A qualitative study was conducted between 2019 and 2020 through semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 17 professionals working it Italian pediatric hospices.
The interviewees do not refer to a common concept of appropriateness, but compare the latter to: the quality of life, the global care of the assisted person, the proportionality of care, the early recognition of the need for palliative care. The discussion within the team emerges as a privileged place to manage the discomfort of individual professionals in the face of treatment choices in conflict with their own values.
the non-referring to a univocal conception of appropriateness deprives professionals of an objective criterion to resolve the most difficult decisions. However, it allows them to establish what from time to time seems to be the most appropriate care pathway for a given patient, at a given time and context, preserving the goal of personalized care.
适宜性在姑息治疗中尤为重要,在姑息治疗中,必须质疑治疗的真正需求。很少有研究探讨儿科姑息治疗专业人员对适宜性的看法,揭示了在面对预后和临终决策的不确定性时,他们有时会面临的冲突。
本研究的目的首先是调查在意大利儿科临终关怀机构工作的医生、护士和心理学家对他们所提供的护理的适宜性的看法。其次,了解对不适当的看法对个人和团队层面的影响。
2019 年至 2020 年期间,采用方便抽样法对意大利儿科临终关怀机构的 17 名专业人员进行了半结构式访谈,进行了一项定性研究。
受访者并没有提到一个共同的适宜性概念,而是将其与生活质量、被照顾者的全面护理、护理的相称性、姑息治疗需求的早期识别进行比较。团队内部的讨论是处理个人专业人员在面对与自己价值观冲突的治疗选择时的不适的一个有利场所。
不参照统一的适宜性概念,使专业人员失去了解决最困难决策的客观标准。然而,它允许他们确定在特定时间和背景下,对特定患者来说,什么样的护理路径似乎是最合适的,从而保持个性化护理的目标。