Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27481.
IMPORTANCE: It is not known whether decreases in Schedule II (high abuse potential) vs Schedule IV (lower abuse potential) opioid prescriptions overall and among high-risk patients followed publication of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) opioid prescribing guideline on March 15, 2016. OBJECTIVES: To compare the odds of new Schedule II opioid (codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone) prescriptions vs Schedule IV opioid (tramadol) prescriptions in the 18-month periods before and after the CDC guideline release to determine whether new prescriptions for Schedule II opioids decreased relative to new prescriptions for tramadol and to assess whether patients with benzodiazepine prescriptions or those with depression, anxiety, or substance use disorders had a greater decrease in receipt of Schedule II vs Schedule IV opioids. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of Optum's deidentified Integrated Claims-Clinical data set for 5 million US adults 18 months before and 18 months after March 15, 2016. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, free of HIV and cancer diagnoses, and had a noncancer painful condition. Patients received new prescriptions for codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, or tramadol. Data were analyzed from September 5, 2014, to September 14, 2017. EXPOSURE: The CDC opioid prescribing guideline published on March 15, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The odds of prescriptions for each Schedule II opioid vs tramadol after guideline publication. RESULTS: Data from 279 435 patients were included in the study. The mean (SD) age of patients was 52.9 (16.5) years; 61% were female and 79.4% were White. The prevalence of new prescriptions for each drug before and after guideline publication was as follows: codeine, 7.1% vs 7.0%; hydrocodone, 47.4% vs 45.6%; oxycodone, 22.4% vs 24.0%; and tramadol, 23.0% vs 23.4%. Overall, the odds of being prescribed hydrocodone or oxycodone vs tramadol significantly decreased after guideline publication (odds ratios, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98 and 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90, respectively). Odds of being prescribed a Schedule II opioid vs tramadol after vs before guideline publication were similar in patients with and without benzodiazepine comedication or psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the 18 months after compared with the 18 months before publication of the CDC prescribing guideline, a 14% decrease in oxycodone prescriptions was observed relative to tramadol. Little change in prescriptions of other Schedule II opioids was observed. Schedule II opioids continue to be prescribed to high-risk patients 18 months after publication of the CDC guideline.
重要性:目前尚不清楚在 2016 年 3 月 15 日疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 发布阿片类药物处方指南之后,总体上和在高风险患者中,II 类(高滥用潜力)与 IV 类(低滥用潜力)阿片类药物处方的减少情况。
目的:比较 CDC 指南发布前后 18 个月内新的 II 类阿片类药物(可待因、氢可酮、羟考酮)与 IV 类阿片类药物(曲马多)处方的可能性,以确定 II 类阿片类药物的新处方是否相对于曲马多减少,并评估是否有苯二氮䓬类药物处方或有抑郁、焦虑或物质使用障碍的患者的 II 类与 IV 类阿片类药物处方减少幅度更大。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项针对 Optum 未识别的综合索赔-临床数据集中 500 万美国成年人的横断面研究,时间为 2016 年 3 月 15 日之前和之后的 18 个月。合格患者年龄在 18 岁或以上,无 HIV 和癌症诊断,并有非癌症疼痛状况。患者接受了新的可待因、氢可酮、羟考酮或曲马多处方。数据于 2014 年 9 月 5 日至 2017 年 9 月 14 日进行分析。
暴露:CDC 于 2016 年 3 月 15 日发布的阿片类药物处方指南。
主要结果和测量:指南发布后每种 II 类阿片类药物与曲马多的处方可能性。
结果:共有 279435 名患者的数据纳入研究。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为 52.9(16.5)岁;61%为女性,79.4%为白人。在指南发布前后,每种药物的新处方发生率如下:可待因,7.1%比 7.0%;氢可酮,47.4%比 45.6%;羟考酮,22.4%比 24.0%;曲马多,23.0%比 23.4%。总体而言,与曲马多相比,氢可酮或羟考酮的处方可能性在指南发布后显著降低(比值比,0.95;95%置信区间,0.91-0.98 和 0.86;95%置信区间,0.82-0.90)。与指南发布前相比,有苯二氮䓬类药物合并用药或精神疾病的患者与无苯二氮䓬类药物合并用药或精神疾病的患者相比,接受 II 类阿片类药物与曲马多处方的可能性相似。
结论和相关性:与指南发布前的 18 个月相比,在 CDC 处方指南发布后的 18 个月内,观察到羟考酮处方减少了 14%,而其他 II 类阿片类药物的处方变化不大。在 CDC 指南发布 18 个月后,仍向高风险患者开具 II 类阿片类药物。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023-10
BMC Psychiatry. 2024-4-2
JAMA Intern Med. 2019-4-1