Suppr超能文献

原发性 versus 小梁切除术后 XEN45 凝胶支架植入术:在白内障术后眼中比较成功率和降眼压潜力。

Primary Versus Posttrabeculectomy XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation: Comparison of Success Rates and Intraocular Pressure-lowering Potential in Pseudophakic Eyes.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Martinus-Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Köln.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2020 Dec;29(12):1115-1119. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001649. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Abstract

PRECIS

The XEN45 Gel Stent can be implanted after failed trabeculectomy without disadvantages compared with primary implantation.

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the outcomes of XEN45 Gel Stent implantation in pseudophakic eyes after failed trabeculectomy and in pseudophakic eyes without other previous surgeries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 30 pseudophakic eyes of 30 patients who underwent XEN45 Gel Stent implantation after failed trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group) and 60 eyes of 60 patients with primary XEN45 Gel Stent implantation (control group). The groups were matched for preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), preoperative medication score, cup-to-disc ratio, follow-up time, visual acuity, and age at a ratio of 1:2. Eyes with concomitant eye diseases, those who had undergone previous surgery, and those with a follow-up duration <6 months were excluded. We compared the success rates on the basis of different criteria: Criteria A (IOP<21 mm Hg, IOP reduction>20%, no repeat surgery); Criteria B (IOP<18 mm Hg, IOP reduction>20%, no repeat surgery); and Criteria C (IOP≤15 mm Hg, IOP reduction≥40%, no repeat surgery).

RESULTS

After an average follow-up period of 20 months, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.4±5.7 to 14.0±4.1 mm Hg in all the study subjects (90 patients). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative IOP, postoperative medication score, revision rate, and repeat surgery rate or success rate.

CONCLUSIONS

XEN45 Gel Stent implantation is a viable option after failed trabeculectomy. According to our results, it has no disadvantage compared with primary XEN45 Gel Stent implantation.

摘要

摘要

XEN45 凝胶支架可以在小梁切除术失败后植入,与初次植入相比没有劣势。

目的

我们旨在比较 XEN45 凝胶支架在小梁切除术失败后的白内障术后眼和无其他先前手术的白内障术后眼中的植入效果。

患者和方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了 30 例 30 只眼,这些眼在小梁切除术失败后接受了 XEN45 凝胶支架植入(小梁切除术组),并纳入了 60 例 60 只眼,这些眼接受了原发性 XEN45 凝胶支架植入(对照组)。两组在术前眼压(IOP)、术前用药评分、杯盘比、随访时间、视力和年龄方面按 1:2 的比例进行匹配。排除伴有眼部疾病、有既往手术史和随访时间<6 个月的眼。我们根据不同标准比较成功率:标准 A(IOP<21mmHg,IOP 降低>20%,无需再次手术);标准 B(IOP<18mmHg,IOP 降低>20%,无需再次手术);和标准 C(IOP≤15mmHg,IOP 降低≥40%,无需再次手术)。

结果

在平均 20 个月的随访后,所有研究对象(90 只眼)的平均眼压从 24.4±5.7mmHg 降至 14.0±4.1mmHg。两组在术后眼压、术后用药评分、修订率、再次手术率或成功率方面均无显著差异。

结论

XEN45 凝胶支架在小梁切除术失败后是一种可行的选择。根据我们的结果,与原发性 XEN45 凝胶支架植入相比,它没有劣势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验