• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷你吊带:它们经得起时间的考验吗?一项为期 10 年的队列研究。

Mini-Slings: Do They Stand the Test of Time? A 10-Year Cohort.

机构信息

Urology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal,

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal,

出版信息

Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):143-147. doi: 10.1159/000511648. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1159/000511648
PMID:33264785
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is known that failures after midurethral slings increase with the follow-up time. Nevertheless, data concerning mini-slings are sparse. To clarify this statement, we analyze a mini-sling cohort with a median follow-up of 10 years. Although the brand used, MiniArc®, is no longer available, an identical device, Solyx™, can still be used, which makes the analysis of the cohort clinically relevant.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 172 women with predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were consecutively treated with the mini-sling MiniArc® from 2006 until 2013. They were reevaluated in 2018. The primary outcome, treatment success, was defined as no self-reported SUI symptoms and no reintervention. Secondary outcomes included the response to patient-reported outcomes. Adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 113 months, 115 (66.9%) women were available for reevaluation. Forty-four (38.3%) women self-reported SUI. Seventeen women had been reoperated, 14 (12.2%) due to the reappearance of SUI and 3 due to complications. Altogether, MiniArc® had an overall success rate of 47.0% at 10 years. Among those not reoperated, 63.3% stated that they were much better or very much better in Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and 71.4% affirmed that their continence problem was normal or mild in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Almost 85% would repeat the surgery. Reoperation due to complications was rare (2.6%). De novo urgency appeared in 30.6% of the patients and it was managed with anticholinergic drugs with favorable outcomes.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This report adds evidence to the long-term outcomes of mini-slings, confirming that they can cure or improve SUI and give patients high satisfaction rates, at the expense of low morbidity.

摘要

介绍

已知尿道中段吊带术后失败的发生率会随着随访时间的延长而增加。然而,关于迷你吊带的数据却很少。为了澄清这一说法,我们分析了一个迷你吊带队列,中位随访时间为 10 年。尽管使用的品牌 MiniArc®已不再供应,但仍可使用相同的设备 Solyx™,这使得该队列的分析具有临床相关性。

材料与方法

2006 年至 2013 年期间,共有 172 名以压力性尿失禁(SUI)为主的女性连续接受了 MiniArc®迷你吊带治疗。2018 年对她们进行了重新评估。主要结局治疗成功定义为无自我报告的 SUI 症状和无再次干预。次要结局包括对患者报告结局的反应。评估了不良事件。

结果

中位随访时间为 113 个月时,115 名(66.9%)女性可进行重新评估。44 名(38.3%)女性自我报告存在 SUI。17 名女性接受了再次手术,14 名(12.2%)因 SUI 再次出现,3 名因并发症。总体而言,10 年后 MiniArc®的总体成功率为 47.0%。在未接受再次手术的患者中,63.3%在患者总体印象改善量表(PGI-I)中表示“好得多”或“非常好”,71.4%在患者总体印象严重程度量表(PGI-S)中表示“正常”或“轻度”。近 85%的患者会再次接受手术。因并发症而再次手术的情况很少见(2.6%)。新出现的急迫性尿失禁发生率为 30.6%,通过使用抗胆碱能药物进行治疗,结果良好。

讨论/结论:本报告为迷你吊带的长期结果提供了证据,证实它们可以治愈或改善 SUI,并使患者满意度高,同时发病率低。

相似文献

1
Mini-Slings: Do They Stand the Test of Time? A 10-Year Cohort.迷你吊带:它们经得起时间的考验吗?一项为期 10 年的队列研究。
Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):143-147. doi: 10.1159/000511648. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.一项比较单切口吊带与耻骨后中段尿道吊带的队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2208-6. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.一项针对压力性尿失禁女性的单切口与经闭孔中尿道吊带术的随机、非盲法扩展研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3362-z. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.单切口迷你吊带(MiniArc)与经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.
6
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.压力性尿失禁女性单切口与传统经闭孔尿道中段吊带术的随机对照研究:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2898-z. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
8
Long-term outcomes of Altis® single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence.Altis®单切口吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的长期疗效
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Mar;33(3):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04936-2. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
10
Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (Align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up.单切口迷你吊带(Ajust)与标准经闭孔尿道中段吊带(Align)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:1年随访
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;54(6):726-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Continence Is Not Affected after Sling Revision with Transvaginal Tape Elongation for Post-Sling Voiding Dysfunction.经阴道吊带延长术修复吊带后治疗吊带术后排尿功能障碍,控尿功能不受影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 22;13(2):637. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020637.
2
Long-term Safety of Synthetic Midurethral Sling Implantation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: A Systematic Review.合成尿道中段吊带植入术治疗成年女性压力性尿失禁的长期安全性:一项系统评价
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jun 10;54:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.013. eCollection 2023 Aug.