• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015年中国股市暴跌前后的跨部门信息传递

Cross-Sectoral Information Transfer in the Chinese Stock Market around Its Crash in 2015.

作者信息

Wang Xudong, Hui Xiaofeng

机构信息

School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2018 Sep 3;20(9):663. doi: 10.3390/e20090663.

DOI:10.3390/e20090663
PMID:33265752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7513187/
Abstract

This paper applies effective transfer entropy to research the information transfer in the Chinese stock market around its crash in 2015. According to the market states, the entire period is divided into four sub-phases: the tranquil, bull, crash, and post-crash periods. Kernel density estimation is used to calculate the effective transfer entropy. Then, the information transfer network is constructed. Nodes' centralities and the directed maximum spanning trees of the networks are analyzed. The results show that, in the tranquil period, the information transfer is weak in the market. In the bull period, the strength and scope of the information transfer increases. The utility sector outputs a great deal of information and is the hub node for the information flow. In the crash period, the information transfer grows further. The market efficiency in this period is worse than that in the other three sub-periods. The information technology sector is the biggest information source, while the consumer staples sector receives the most information. The interactions of the sectors become more direct. In the post-crash period, information transfer declines but is still stronger than the tranquil time. The financial sector receives the largest amount of information and is the pivot node.

摘要

本文应用有效转移熵来研究2015年中国股市暴跌前后的信息传递。根据市场状态,整个时期分为四个子阶段:平静期、牛市期、暴跌期和暴跌后时期。采用核密度估计来计算有效转移熵。然后构建信息传递网络。分析了网络中节点的中心性和有向最大生成树。结果表明,在平静期,市场中的信息传递较弱。在牛市期,信息传递的强度和范围增加。公用事业部门输出大量信息,是信息流的枢纽节点。在暴跌期,信息传递进一步增强。这一时期的市场效率低于其他三个子时期。信息技术部门是最大的信息源,而日常消费品部门接收的信息最多。各部门之间的相互作用变得更加直接。在暴跌后时期,信息传递有所下降,但仍强于平静期。金融部门接收的信息量最大,是关键节点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/9011d9147975/entropy-20-00663-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/a27803954e22/entropy-20-00663-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/220e4949b9f1/entropy-20-00663-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/ed5c5e61ff74/entropy-20-00663-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/9011d9147975/entropy-20-00663-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/a27803954e22/entropy-20-00663-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/220e4949b9f1/entropy-20-00663-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/ed5c5e61ff74/entropy-20-00663-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/488e/7513187/9011d9147975/entropy-20-00663-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-Sectoral Information Transfer in the Chinese Stock Market around Its Crash in 2015.2015年中国股市暴跌前后的跨部门信息传递
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Sep 3;20(9):663. doi: 10.3390/e20090663.
2
Information Transfer between Stock Market Sectors: A Comparison between the USA and China.股票市场板块间的信息传递:美国与中国的比较
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 7;22(2):194. doi: 10.3390/e22020194.
3
Spreading Dynamics of Capital Flow Transfer in Complex Financial Networks.复杂金融网络中资本流动转移的传播动态
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;25(8):1240. doi: 10.3390/e25081240.
4
Network Analysis of Multivariate Transfer Entropy of Cryptocurrencies in Times of Turbulence.动荡时期加密货币多元转移熵的网络分析
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jul 11;22(7):760. doi: 10.3390/e22070760.
5
Dynamic Analyses of Contagion Risk and Module Evolution on the SSE A-Shares Market Based on Minimum Information Entropy.基于最小信息熵的上证A股市场传染风险与模块演化动态分析
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;23(4):434. doi: 10.3390/e23040434.
6
Dynamics of Information Flow between the Chinese A-Share Market and the U.S. Stock Market: From the 2008 Crisis to the COVID-19 Pandemic Period.中国A股市场与美国股票市场之间的信息流动态:从2008年危机到新冠疫情时期
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;24(8):1102. doi: 10.3390/e24081102.
7
Stock Net Entropy: Evidence from the Chinese Growth Enterprise Market.股票净熵:来自中国创业板市场的证据。
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Oct 19;20(10):805. doi: 10.3390/e20100805.
8
Weathering the crash: Do customer-company relationships pay off during economic crises?经受住冲击:客户与公司的关系在经济危机期间会有回报吗?
J Acad Mark Sci. 2023 May 29:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1.
9
Exploring Market State and Stock Interactions on the Minute Timescale.探索分钟时间尺度上的市场状态与股票互动。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149648. eCollection 2016.
10
The dynamic network of industries in US stock market: Evidence of GFC, COVID-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine war.美国股票市场中行业的动态网络:全球金融危机、新冠疫情和俄乌战争的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 6;9(9):e19726. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19726. eCollection 2023 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Analyses of Contagion Risk and Module Evolution on the SSE A-Shares Market Based on Minimum Information Entropy.基于最小信息熵的上证A股市场传染风险与模块演化动态分析
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Apr 7;23(4):434. doi: 10.3390/e23040434.
2
The Threshold Effect of Leveraged Trading on the Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China.杠杆交易对股价崩盘风险的阈值效应:来自中国的证据。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 26;22(3):268. doi: 10.3390/e22030268.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum spanning tree filtering of correlations for varying time scales and size of fluctuations.最小生成树过滤随时间尺度和波动大小变化的相关性。
Phys Rev E. 2017 May;95(5-1):052313. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052313. Epub 2017 May 17.
2
Quantification of Drive-Response Relationships Between Residues During Protein Folding.蛋白质折叠过程中残基间驱动-响应关系的量化
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Aug 13;9(8). doi: 10.1021/ct4002784.
3
Entropy-based analysis and bioinformatics-inspired integration of global economic information transfer.
基于熵的分析和受生物信息学启发的全球经济信息传递的综合
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e51986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051986. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
4
Transfer entropy estimation and directional coupling change detection in biomedical time series.生物医学时间序列中的传递熵估计和方向耦合变化检测。
Biomed Eng Online. 2012 Apr 13;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-11-19.
5
Transfer entropy in magnetoencephalographic data: quantifying information flow in cortical and cerebellar networks.脑磁图数据中的转移熵:量化皮质和小脑网络中的信息流。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 Mar;105(1-2):80-97. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 27.
6
Transfer entropy--a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences.转移熵——神经科学中一种用于有效连接性的无模型度量。
J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Feb;30(1):45-67. doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0262-3. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
7
Relative performance of mutual information estimation methods for quantifying the dependence among short and noisy data.用于量化短时间和噪声数据之间依赖性的互信息估计方法的相对性能。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Aug;76(2 Pt 2):026209. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.026209. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
8
Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales.大脑皮层的网络结构在多个时间尺度上塑造功能连接。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10240-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701519104. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
9
Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals.非线性因果关系的统计评估:在癫痫脑电信号中的应用。
J Neurosci Methods. 2003 Apr 15;124(2):113-28. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00367-9.
10
Measuring information transfer.测量信息传递。
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 10;85(2):461-4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.461.