Suppr超能文献

用于诊断血管迷走性晕厥的头高位倾斜试验结果分析中的熵测量

Entropy Measures in Analysis of Head up Tilt Test Outcome for Diagnosing Vasovagal Syncope.

作者信息

Buszko Katarzyna, Piątkowska Agnieszka, Koźluk Edward, Fabiszak Tomasz, Opolski Grzegorz

机构信息

Department of Theoretical Foundations of Bio-Medical Science and Medical Informatics, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, 02-091 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2018 Dec 16;20(12):976. doi: 10.3390/e20120976.

Abstract

The paper presents possible applications of entropy measures in analysis of biosignals recorded during head up tilt testing (HUTT) in patients with suspected vasovagal syndrome. The study group comprised 80 patients who developed syncope during HUTT (57 in the passive phase of the test (HUTT(+) group) and 23 who had negative result of passive phase and developed syncope after provocation with nitroglycerine (HUTT(-) group)). The paper focuses on assessment of monitored signals' complexity (heart rate expressed as R-R intervals (RRI), blood pressure (sBP, dBP) and stroke volume (SV)) using various types of entropy measures (Sample Entropy (SE), Fuzzy Entropy (FE), Shannon Entropy (Sh), Conditional Entropy (CE), Permutation Entropy (PE)). Assessment of the complexity of signals in supine position indicated presence of significant differences between HUTT(+) versus HUTT(-) patients only for Conditional Entropy (CE(RRI)). Values of CE(RRI) higher than 0.7 indicate likelihood of a positive result of HUTT already at the passive phase. During tilting, in the pre-syncope phase, significant differences were found for: (SE(sBP), SE(dBP), FE(RRI), FE(sBP), FE(dBP), FE(SV), Sh(sBP), Sh(SV), CE(sBP), CE(dBP)). HUTT(+) patients demonstrated significant changes in signals' complexity more frequently than HUTT(-) patients. When comparing entropy measurements done in the supine position with those during tilting, SV assessed in HUTT(+) patients was the only parameter for which all tested measures of entropy (SE(SV), FE(SV), Sh(SV), CE(SV), PE(SV)) showed significant differences.

摘要

本文介绍了熵测度在疑似血管迷走性晕厥综合征患者头高位倾斜试验(HUTT)期间记录的生物信号分析中的可能应用。研究组包括80例在HUTT期间发生晕厥的患者(57例在试验的被动阶段发生晕厥(HUTT(+)组),23例被动阶段结果为阴性且在使用硝酸甘油激发后发生晕厥(HUTT(-)组))。本文重点使用各种类型的熵测度(样本熵(SE)、模糊熵(FE)、香农熵(Sh)、条件熵(CE)、排列熵(PE))评估监测信号的复杂性(以R-R间期(RRI)表示的心率、血压(收缩压、舒张压)和每搏输出量(SV))。仰卧位时信号复杂性的评估表明,仅条件熵(CE(RRI))在HUTT(+)组与HUTT(-)组患者之间存在显著差异。CE(RRI)值高于0.7表明HUTT在被动阶段就可能出现阳性结果。在倾斜过程中,在晕厥前期,发现以下指标存在显著差异:(SE(收缩压)、SE(舒张压)、FE(RRI)、FE(收缩压)、FE(舒张压)、FE(SV)、Sh(收缩压)、Sh(SV)、CE(收缩压)、CE(舒张压))。HUTT(+)组患者信号复杂性的变化比HUTT(-)组患者更频繁。当比较仰卧位与倾斜期间进行的熵测量时,HUTT(+)组患者评估的SV是唯一所有测试的熵测度(SE(SV)、FE(SV)、Sh(SV)、CE(SV)、PE(SV))均显示出显著差异的参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e99/7512576/eb679d7be4d7/entropy-20-00976-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验