• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗前列腺癌的结果。

Robotic Radical Cystectomy Outcomes after Intervention for Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):633-638. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0627.

DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0627
PMID:33267670
Abstract

We evaluated patients who underwent treatment for prostate cancer and then subsequent robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Our objective was to understand clinical, pathologic, and survival outcomes in these patients. A total of 333 male patients underwent RARC with standard intracorporeal urinary diversion from 2009 to 2019. We evaluated patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy (RP) and either external beam radiation or brachytherapy (XRT) before RARC. These patients were compared with patients who underwent RARC without any prior intervention for or history of prostate cancer (radical cystectomy [RC]). Patients in the RP and XRT groups were found to be older than the RC group ( = 0.0108) and also have a greater Charlson comorbidity index ( < 0.001). There was no difference in estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay across all three groups. The RP group had a higher rate of positive margins 31.58% compared with RC and XRT at 8.22% and 10.00%, respectively ( = 0.0036). There was also a higher rate of extravesical disease on final pathology report for the XRT group at 60.00% compared with 37.5% and 36.85% for RC and RP, respectively ( = 0.0056). Overall survival was lowest in the XRT group compared with RP and RC ( > 0.001) with no difference in recurrence-free survival. Patients in the RP group have higher rates of positive margin, whereas patients in the XRT group have higher rates of extravesical disease and overall survival after undergoing a RARC. Careful counseling and attention to these parameters is required in these patient populations.

摘要

我们评估了接受前列腺癌治疗然后接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)的患者。我们的目的是了解这些患者的临床、病理和生存结果。

共有 333 名男性患者于 2009 年至 2019 年接受了标准的腔内尿流改道机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术。我们评估了接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)并接受外照射或近距离放射治疗(XRT)的患者,然后再进行 RARC。将这些患者与未接受任何先前干预或前列腺癌病史的患者进行比较(根治性膀胱切除术[RC])。结果发现,RP 和 XRT 组的患者比 RC 组年龄更大(=0.0108),且 Charlson 合并症指数更高(<0.001)。三组患者的估计失血量、手术时间和住院时间均无差异。RP 组的阳性切缘率为 31.58%,明显高于 RC 组的 8.22%和 XRT 组的 10.00%(=0.0036)。XRT 组的最终病理报告中,有更多的膀胱外疾病,占 60.00%,而 RC 组和 RP 组分别为 37.5%和 36.85%(=0.0056)。XRT 组的总体生存率最低,明显低于 RP 组和 RC 组(>0.001),两组的无复发生存率无差异。RP 组患者的阳性切缘率较高,而 XRT 组患者的膀胱外疾病和总体生存率较高,这些患者在接受 RARC 治疗后需要仔细的咨询和关注这些参数。

相似文献

1
Robotic Radical Cystectomy Outcomes after Intervention for Prostate Cancer.机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗前列腺癌的结果。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):633-638. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0627.
2
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
3
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.随机对照试验比较开放性根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
5
Assessing pentafecta achievement after robot-assisted radical cystectomy and its association with surgical experience: Results from a high-volume institution.评估机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的五连胜成就及其与手术经验的关联:来自一家大型机构的结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Jun;40(6):272.e11-272.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
The feasibility and effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.新辅助化疗后机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的可行性和有效性。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;47(3):252-256. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw191.
7
Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open: early Australian experience.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术与开放手术对比:澳大利亚早期经验
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):1028-1032. doi: 10.1111/ans.14361. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术:根治性膀胱切除术改良方法的描述。
Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):654-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 May 27.
10
Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates.机器人辅助膀胱切除术后从体外到体内尿流改道的安全过渡:降低手术时间、出血量和并发症发生率的秘诀。
World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted salvage radical cystectomy.机器人辅助挽救性根治性膀胱切除术的可行性与安全性。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 25;6(1):e459. doi: 10.1002/bco2.459. eCollection 2025 Jan.