• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助挽救性根治性膀胱切除术的可行性与安全性。

The feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted salvage radical cystectomy.

作者信息

Rinott Mizrahi Gal, Lawrentschuk Nathan, Thomas Benjamin, Dundee Philip

机构信息

The Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria Australia.

Epworth Hospitals Melbourne Victoria Australia.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 25;6(1):e459. doi: 10.1002/bco2.459. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/bco2.459
PMID:39877581
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11771485/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted salvage radical cystectomy (RA-SRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively searched the prospectively collected surgical database of two highly experienced robotic urological surgeons for cases of RA-SRC, defined as RARC performed post-previous pelvic RT for palliative or oncologic treatment purposes. Collected data included demographic and clinical information and outcome measures including operative course, hospital stay and complications.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in the current analysis. All patients had previous RT to the pelvis with 12 patients also having prior radical pelvic surgery. Indications for salvage cystectomy were either palliation ( = 12) or oncological (MIBC or high risk NMIBC,  = 6). There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to open surgery. Ninety day postoperative complications were recorded in 11 patients (61.1%), with major complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 3 and 4) in three patients (16.6%). After a median follow-up of 43.5 months, one late postoperative complication was observed requiring surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our data, together with the limited published data from other cohorts of RA-SRC, suggest that in experienced hands, RA-SRC is feasible, with intraoperative and perioperative complication rates that are lower than the published data for open SRC and are equivalent to open primary RC. These data will contribute to treatment decision making both in patients with post-pelvic radiation symptoms requiring palliation and patients with MIBC considering or treated with trimodal treatment.

摘要

目的

评估机器人辅助挽救性根治性膀胱切除术(RA-SRC)的可行性和安全性。

材料与方法

我们回顾性检索了两位经验丰富的机器人泌尿外科医生前瞻性收集的手术数据库中RA-SRC的病例,RA-SRC定义为在先前盆腔放疗后为姑息或肿瘤治疗目的而进行的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术。收集的数据包括人口统计学和临床信息以及结果指标,包括手术过程、住院时间和并发症。

结果

本分析纳入了18例患者。所有患者均曾接受盆腔放疗,其中12例患者还曾接受过根治性盆腔手术。挽救性膀胱切除术的指征为姑息治疗(n = 12)或肿瘤治疗(肌层浸润性膀胱癌或高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌,n = 6)。术中无并发症,无一例转为开放手术。11例患者(61.1%)记录有术后90天并发症,3例患者(16.6%)出现严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo 3级和4级)。中位随访43.5个月后,观察到1例术后晚期并发症需要手术干预。

结论

我们的数据,连同其他RA-SRC队列的有限已发表数据表明,在经验丰富的医生手中,RA-SRC是可行的,其术中和围手术期并发症发生率低于已发表的开放手术SRC数据,且与开放原发性根治性膀胱切除术相当。这些数据将有助于为有盆腔放疗后症状需要姑息治疗的患者以及考虑或接受三联治疗的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的治疗决策提供参考。

相似文献

1
The feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted salvage radical cystectomy.机器人辅助挽救性根治性膀胱切除术的可行性与安全性。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 25;6(1):e459. doi: 10.1002/bco2.459. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.开放性根治性膀胱切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
3
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.成人膀胱癌的机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 24;4(4):CD011903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011903.pub2.
5
Comparative Effectiveness in Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multicenter Contemporary Retrospective Cohort Study.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结果的比较有效性:一项多中心当代回顾性队列研究的结果
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Nov 15;6(6):1233-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
The Impact of Previous Prostate Surgery on Surgical Outcomes for Patients Treated with Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.前列腺手术史对接受机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术患者手术结局的影响。
Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):358-365. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: 3-Year Outcomes from a Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合完全腔内尿路转流与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的 3 年结果。
Eur Urol. 2024 May;85(5):422-430. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL).一项关于开放性、机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的单中心早期随机对照三臂试验(CORAL)
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
10
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Oncologic, Perioperative, and Complication-related outcomes.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:肿瘤学、围手术期和并发症相关结局的荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;2(4):443-447. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与体外尿路分流术对比开放性根治性膀胱切除术对膀胱癌患者 90 天内发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 7;327(21):2092-2103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7393.
2
Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review.机器人手术与泌尿外科开放和腹腔镜手术方法的比较:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):11-29. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01416-7. Epub 2022 May 8.
3
Complications and Outcomes of Salvage Cystectomy after Trimodality Therapy.根治性膀胱切除术治疗后挽救性膀胱切除术的并发症和结局。
J Urol. 2021 Jul;206(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001696. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
4
Robotic Radical Cystectomy Outcomes after Intervention for Prostate Cancer.机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗前列腺癌的结果。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):633-638. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0627.
5
Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on short-term and long-term outcomes of radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术的医院和外科医生手术量对短期和长期结果的影响。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Sep;30(5):701-710. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000805.
6
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines.欧洲泌尿外科学会肌层浸润性和转移性膀胱癌指南:2020 年指南摘要。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
The Effect of Complexity of the Surgical Field on Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy.手术视野复杂性对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局的影响。
Urology. 2020 Jul;141:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.033. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
Complication rate after cystectomy following pelvic radiotherapy: an international, multicenter, retrospective series of 682 cases.盆腔放疗后行膀胱切除术的并发症发生率:一项国际性、多中心、回顾性的 682 例系列研究。
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1959-1968. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02982-6. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
Examining the relationship between complications and perioperative mortality following radical cystectomy: a population-based analysis.分析根治性膀胱切除术术后并发症与围手术期死亡率之间的关系:一项基于人群的分析。
BJU Int. 2019 Jul;124(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.14636. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
10
Robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion: practical review of current surgical techniques.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):14-25. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02780-6. Epub 2016 Aug 31.