Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery Innovative Techniques - Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Laboratory of Preclinical and Surgical Studies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Hip Int. 2020 Dec;30(2_suppl):3-12. doi: 10.1177/1120700020964996.
Avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVN) is 1 of the main factors causing disability in young adults. Hip prosthesis can be considered an effective treatment of the painful symptoms but it is a major surgical intervention for this type of population. Thus, a large space should be left to therapeutic alternatives such as regenerative medicine.This retrospective study evaluates 52 AVN treated by core decompression, bone chips allograft, fibrin platelet-rich plasma (PRF) and concentrated autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs).
The AVN was diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and graded according to ARCO classification: a patient was classified stage 1 (21 patients), stage 3 (26 patients), and 4 patients were classified as stage 4. We evaluated patients with functional scores (Harris Hip Score) and radiological analysis at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the procedure. Patients requiring prosthetic replacement of the joint were included; in these cases, follow-up was interrupted at the time of the joint replacement procedure.
Our statistical analysis showed differences between survived and failed treatments, in terms of patient profile and ARCO radiological classification.The best result occurred in patients with ARCO grades 1 and 2, while the more advanced grades showed a high failure rate. It is interesting to note that ARCO quantification, conceived as the joint surface involved in the necrosis, has a negative influence on the outcome of the procedure. Indeed, patients affected by ARCO 3a, where necrosis involved a small portion of the femoral epiphysis and the collapse of the articular surface was limited to 2 mm, showed results similar to those obtained in patients with ARCO 1 and 2.
In conclusion, compared with the alternative technique of decompression, our data suggest that post-collapse cases with a small area of necrosis and the use of bone grafts may show better results compared to those of the literature.
股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)是导致年轻成年人残疾的主要因素之一。髋关节假体被认为是治疗疼痛症状的有效方法,但对于这类人群来说,这是一种主要的手术干预。因此,应该为治疗选择留出很大的空间,例如再生医学。本回顾性研究评估了 52 例经核心减压、骨屑同种异体移植、纤维蛋白血小板丰富的血浆(PRF)和浓缩自体间充质基质细胞(MSCs)治疗的 AVN。
使用磁共振成像(MRI)诊断 AVN,并根据 ARCO 分类进行分级:21 例患者为 1 期,26 例患者为 3 期,4 例患者为 4 期。我们在手术后 3、6、12 和 24 个月时使用功能评分(Harris 髋关节评分)和放射学分析评估患者。需要关节置换的患者包括在内;在这些情况下,在关节置换手术时随访中断。
我们的统计分析显示,在患者特征和 ARCO 放射学分类方面,存活治疗和失败治疗之间存在差异。ARCO 分级 1 和 2 的患者结果最好,而更高级别的分级显示出较高的失败率。有趣的是,ARCO 定量,即坏死涉及的关节表面,对手术结果有负面影响。事实上,ARCO 3a 受累的患者,其中坏死累及股骨骨骺的一小部分,关节表面的塌陷仅限于 2mm,其结果与 ARCO 1 和 2 患者的结果相似。
总之,与减压的替代技术相比,我们的数据表明,对于塌陷后面积较小的病例,以及使用骨移植物,可能会比文献中的结果更好。