Gusler Stephanie K, Jackson Yo, Brown Shaquanna
Clinical Child Psychology, Human Development Center, University of Kansas, Sunnyside Avenue, Room 2015, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.
Department of Psychology, Child Maltreatment Solutions Network, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801 USA.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Nov 23;13(4):455-467. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00296-8. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Research shows that exposure to child maltreatment increases the risk of internalizing symptoms for youth, and that youth in foster care are at a particularly high risk of symptoms. However, not all youth who experience maltreatment evidence maladjustment, making the link between exposure and mental health outcomes unclear and creating a need to examine what factors buffer against symptomatology. A sample of youth in foster care was used to provide a new examination of the relation between child maltreatment exposure and internalizing symptoms, to test the possible moderating effects of both appraisals and spirituality, and examine differences between children and adolescents. Participants were 486 youth in foster care (M age = 13; 204 children; 282 adolescents). Youth completed self-report measures through the SPARK project (Studying Pathways to Adjustment and Resilience in Kids). Although appraisals and spirituality were not significant moderators, significant main effects emerged. For children, regression analyses showed that maltreatment exposure and lower scores on spiritual prosocial attitudes accounted for the majority of the 21% of the variance in internalizing symptoms. For adolescents 28% of the variance in internalizing symptoms was accounted for by greater maltreatment exposure, lower scores on spiritual prosocial attitudes, higher scores on relationship with a God/Higher Power, and more negative appraisals of stressful life events. The current study provides support for cognitive-based interventions for adolescents aimed at increasing appraisal flexibility and suggests that both children and adolescents could benefit from the development of prosocial attitudes often tied to spirituality but could be reinforced in additional settings.
研究表明,遭受儿童虐待会增加青少年出现内化症状的风险,且寄养中的青少年出现这些症状的风险尤其高。然而,并非所有经历过虐待的青少年都会出现适应不良,这使得虐待经历与心理健康结果之间的联系尚不明确,因此有必要研究哪些因素可以缓冲症状的出现。本研究以寄养中的青少年为样本,重新审视了儿童虐待经历与内化症状之间的关系,检验了评估和灵性这两个因素可能产生的调节作用,并考察了儿童与青少年之间的差异。研究参与者为486名寄养青少年(平均年龄 = 13岁;204名儿童;282名青少年)。这些青少年通过SPARK项目(研究儿童适应与复原力的途径)完成了自我报告测量。虽然评估和灵性并非显著的调节因素,但出现了显著的主效应。对于儿童来说,回归分析表明,虐待经历以及灵性亲社会态度得分较低,解释了内化症状中21%变异的大部分。对于青少年而言,内化症状中28%的变异可由更多的虐待经历、灵性亲社会态度得分较低、与上帝/更高力量的关系得分较高以及对压力性生活事件的更多负面评估来解释。本研究为针对青少年的基于认知的干预措施提供了支持,这些措施旨在提高评估的灵活性,并表明儿童和青少年都可能从培养通常与灵性相关的亲社会态度中受益,但这种态度可在其他环境中得到强化。