Suppr超能文献

将种族作为变量使用时的概念和方法问题:政策影响。

Conceptual and methodological issues in the use of race as a variable: policy implications.

作者信息

Wilkinson D Y, King G

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0027.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 1987;65 Suppl 1:56-71.

PMID:3327009
Abstract

The history, reality, and prolonged effects of racial stratification and its supportive ideology in the United States require systematic study of the impact of racial perceptions in the health sphere and in every facet of American life (Berry 1965; Berreman 1985; Blackwell 1985). In this regard, the use of race as an independent variable in social research is, in principle, similar to the presumed explanatory power of other status characteristics such as class or economic position. Depending on which meaning is intended, the potential policy, health services, and sociopolitical outcomes could be diametrically opposed to one another. Far from being an esoteric subject among intellectuals, any definition of race has fundamental and practical extensions to cultural and political realities. Essentially, studies and discussions of racial similarities and differences in health matters, whether intended or not, go beyond statistical compilations and correlations and reflect norms, values, the country's common beliefs (Praeger 1982), and the structural positions of majority and minority groups. Presumably, these are among the reasons that racial categories are studied in social science. They are assumed to represent socially relevant and unique histories, experiences, and statuses which differentiate black and white Americans in particular. The risks in epidemiologic and in social science research involve the preoccupation with disparities in the health difficulties among them; the attribution of racial biology and genetic traits to virtually all health spheres; the assumed preponderance of disabling conditions for blacks; and the unrelenting focus on only two racial populations despite our having a multiethnic society (Wilkinson 1987). Since health behaviors are directly associated with a group's "way of life," they should be carefully scrutinized within relevant socio-environmental contexts as part of the scientific processes of discovery, for the underlying premises, ideological translations, and practical applications of their studies especially with respect to race-specific health research. It is likely that systematic probing beyond demographic or constitutional factors will enable social scientists and health researchers to discover that for certain behaviors (e.g., prevention), individual attributes such as race and sex--and even knowledge, roles, attitudes, and diets--may explain far less than will environmental hazards and basic structural variables such as the organization of the health care delivery system, availability of and access to care, ability to pay, provider patterns, diagnostic processes, institutional operations, and quality of care.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

种族分层及其支持性意识形态在美国的历史、现实和长期影响,要求我们系统研究种族观念在健康领域以及美国生活方方面面的影响(贝里,1965年;贝里曼,1985年;布莱克韦尔,1985年)。在这方面,在社会研究中把种族用作自变量,原则上类似于阶级或经济地位等其他地位特征的假定解释力。根据所意图的含义不同,潜在的政策、卫生服务及社会政治结果可能截然相反。种族的任何定义远非知识分子之间的深奥话题,它对文化和政治现实有着根本和实际的延伸。本质上,关于健康问题中种族异同的研究和讨论,无论有意与否,都超越了统计汇编和相关性,反映了规范、价值观、国家的共同信念(普雷格,1982年)以及多数群体和少数群体的结构地位。大概这些就是社会科学研究种族类别的部分原因。它们被认为代表了具有社会相关性且独特的历史、经历和地位,这些尤其使美国黑人和白人区分开来。流行病学和社会科学研究中的风险包括:专注于他们之间健康困境的差异;将种族生物学和遗传特征几乎归因于所有健康领域;假定黑人中致残状况占优势;以及尽管我们是一个多民族社会,但却始终只关注两个种族群体(威尔金森,1987年)。由于健康行为与一个群体的“生活方式”直接相关,在相关社会环境背景下,它们应作为科学发现过程的一部分受到仔细审视,审视其研究的潜在前提、意识形态转化和实际应用,特别是关于特定种族健康研究的方面。超越人口统计学或体质因素进行系统探究,很可能会使社会科学家和健康研究人员发现,对于某些行为(如预防)而言,种族和性别等个体属性——甚至知识、角色、态度和饮食——所起的解释作用可能远小于环境危害和基本结构变量,如医疗保健提供系统的组织、医疗服务的可及性和可获得性、支付能力、提供者模式、诊断过程、机构运作以及医疗质量。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验