Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Independent researcher, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0242509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242509. eCollection 2020.
Library Genesis is one of the oldest and largest illegal scholarly book collections online. Without the authorization of copyright holders, this shadow library hosts and makes more than 2 million scholarly publications, monographs, and textbooks available. This paper analyzes a set of weblogs of one of the Library Genesis mirrors, provided to us by one of the service's administrators. We reconstruct the social and economic factors that drive the global and European demand for illicit scholarly literature. In particular, we test if lower income regions can compensate for the shortcomings in legal access infrastructures by more intensive use of illicit open resources. We found that while richer regions are the most intensive users of shadow libraries, poorer regions face structural limitations that prevent them from fully capitalizing on freely accessible knowledge. We discuss these findings in the wider context of open access publishing, and point out that open access knowledge, if not met with proper knowledge absorption infrastructures, has limited usefulness in addressing knowledge access and production inequalities.
LibGen 是历史最悠久、规模最大的在线非法学术书籍收藏馆之一。未经版权所有者授权,这个影子图书馆托管并提供了超过 200 万份学术出版物、专论和教科书。本文分析了 LibGen 镜像之一的一组博客,这是由该服务的管理员之一提供给我们的。我们重建了驱动全球和欧洲对非法学术文献需求的社会和经济因素。特别是,我们测试了低收入地区是否可以通过更密集地使用非法开放资源来弥补合法获取基础设施的不足。我们发现,虽然富裕地区是影子图书馆的最密集使用者,但较贫困地区面临结构性限制,使其无法充分利用免费获取的知识。我们在开放获取出版的更广泛背景下讨论了这些发现,并指出,如果没有适当的知识吸收基础设施,开放获取知识在解决知识获取和生产不平等方面的用处有限。