• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替米沙坦联合培哚普利与缬沙坦联合培哚普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:一项基于电子病历的回顾性队列研究

Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243371. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243371
PMID:33270787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7714357/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lisinopril and losartan manufacturer labels recommend twice-daily dosing (BID) if once-daily (QDay) is insufficient to lower blood pressure (BP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective cohort study of patients taking QDay lisinopril and losartan who experienced a dose-doubling (index date). A text-processing tool categorized BID and QDay groups at the index date based on administration instructions. We excluded: pregnant/hospice, regimens other than BID/QDay, and without BP measurements -6 months/+12 months of the index date. The most proximal BP measurements -6 months and +2 weeks to 12 months of the index date were used to evaluate BP differences. Propensity scores were generated, and differences in BP and adverse events (angioedema, acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia) between BID/QDay groups were analyzed within dosing cohorts using inverse propensity of treatment-weighted regression models. Of 11,210 and 6,051 patients who met all criteria for lisinopril and losartan, 784 (7.0%) and 453 (7.5%) were taking BID, respectively. BID patients were older and had higher comorbidity and medication burdens. There were no differences in systolic/diastolic BP between BID and QDay, with absolute differences in mean systolic BP ranging from -1.8 to 0.7 mmHg and diastolic BP ranging from -1.1 to 0.1 mmHg (all 95% confidence intervals [CI] cross 0). Lisinopril 10mg BID was associated with an increased odds of angioedema compared to lisinopril 20mg QDay (odds ratio 2.27, 95%CI 1.13-4.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted models do not support improved effectiveness or safety of BID lisinopril and losartan.

摘要

背景

赖诺普利和氯沙坦的制造商标签建议,如果每日一次(QD)不足以降低血压(BP),则应每日两次(BID)给药。

方法和结果

对接受 QD 赖诺普利和氯沙坦治疗且剂量加倍(索引日期)的患者进行回顾性队列研究。基于给药说明,使用文本处理工具在索引日期对 BID 和 QD 组进行分类。我们排除了:孕妇/临终关怀、非 BID/QD 方案以及无 BP 测量值-索引日期前 6 个月/后 12 个月。使用最接近的 BP 测量值-索引日期前 6 个月和后 2 周至 12 个月,评估 BP 差异。生成倾向评分,并使用逆处理倾向加权回归模型分析 BID/QD 组之间在剂量组内的 BP 和不良事件(血管性水肿、急性肾损伤、高钾血症)的差异。符合赖诺普利和氯沙坦所有标准的 11210 例和 6051 例患者中,分别有 784 例(7.0%)和 453 例(7.5%)接受 BID。BID 患者年龄较大,合并症和药物负担较高。BID 和 QD 之间的收缩压/舒张压无差异,平均收缩压的绝对差异范围为-1.8 至 0.7mmHg,舒张压的绝对差异范围为-1.1 至 0.1mmHg(所有 95%置信区间 [CI] 均跨越 0)。与赖诺普利 20mg QD 相比,赖诺普利 10mg BID 与血管性水肿的发生几率增加相关(比值比 2.27,95%CI 1.13-4.58)。

结论

调整后的模型不支持 BID 赖诺普利和氯沙坦的有效性或安全性提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/e95f488e55c1/pone.0243371.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/5be44ad6c507/pone.0243371.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/4fdd34715849/pone.0243371.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/e95f488e55c1/pone.0243371.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/5be44ad6c507/pone.0243371.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/4fdd34715849/pone.0243371.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ea7/7714357/e95f488e55c1/pone.0243371.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.替米沙坦联合培哚普利与缬沙坦联合培哚普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:一项基于电子病历的回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243371. eCollection 2020.
2
Placebo effect and efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension not controlled with lisinopril or losartan: a phase IV, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.安慰剂效应及比索洛尔在未被依那普利或氯沙坦控制的高血压患者中的疗效:一项 IV 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Apr;13(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0010-y.
3
Lisinopril for the treatment of hypertension within the first 24 hours of acute ischemic stroke and follow-up.赖诺普利用于急性缺血性卒中发病后24小时内高血压的治疗及随访。
Am J Hypertens. 2007 Mar;20(3):270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.08.005.
4
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
5
A randomized, open-label, dose-response study of losartan in hypertensive children.氯沙坦治疗高血压儿童的随机、开放标签、剂量反应研究。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Aug 7;9(8):1441-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11111113. Epub 2014 May 29.
6
Dual renin-angiotensin system blockade at optimal doses for proteinuria.以最佳剂量进行双重肾素-血管紧张素系统阻断治疗蛋白尿。
Kidney Int. 2002 Sep;62(3):1020-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00536.x.
7
Effectiveness of chlorthalidone/amiloride versus losartan in patients with stage I hypertension and diabetes mellitus: results from the PREVER-treatment randomized controlled trial.氯噻酮/阿米洛利对比氯沙坦在 I 期高血压合并糖尿病患者中的疗效:来自 PREVER-TREATMENT 随机对照试验的结果。
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Feb;58(2):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01611-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Efficacy and safety of twice- vs once-daily dosing of lisinopril for hypertension.赖诺普利每日两次与每日一次给药治疗高血压的疗效及安全性
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Sep;19(9):868-873. doi: 10.1111/jch.13011. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
9
Safety and efficacy of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren in elderly patients with hypertension.口服直接肾素抑制剂阿利吉仑在老年高血压患者中的安全性和有效性。
Blood Press. 2007;16(6):381-91. doi: 10.1080/08037050701717014.
10
Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.氯沙坦、氨氯地平和赖诺普利三种抗高血压药物对高血压患者降压效果及耐受性的前瞻性随机研究。
Heart Vessels. 2004 Jan;19(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-003-0724-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nanofabrication of Losartan Potassium Sustained Release Floating Microspheres using Different Grades of Ethyl Cellulose and its Insight on Release Profiles.采用不同等级乙基纤维素的氯沙坦钾控释漂浮微球的纳米制备及其对释放谱的影响。
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(28):2257-2265. doi: 10.2174/0113816128309675240530060752.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing the Precision of Hypertension Treatment Through Personalized Trials: a Pilot Study.通过个体化试验提高高血压治疗的精准度:一项试点研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):839-845. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04831-z. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
2
Treating Hypertension in Children With -of-1 Trials.-临床试验治疗儿童高血压。
Pediatrics. 2019 Apr;143(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1818. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
3
Quality and Variability of Patient Directions in Electronic Prescriptions in the Ambulatory Care Setting.在门诊环境中,电子处方中患者指导的质量和变异性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):691-699. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17404. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
4
Current Trends of Hypertension Treatment in the United States.美国高血压治疗的现状。
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1008-1014. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx085.
5
Efficacy and safety of twice- vs once-daily dosing of lisinopril for hypertension.赖诺普利每日两次与每日一次给药治疗高血压的疗效及安全性
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Sep;19(9):868-873. doi: 10.1111/jch.13011. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
A review on prescribing patterns of antihypertensive drugs.抗高血压药物处方模式综述。
Clin Hypertens. 2016 Mar 27;22:7. doi: 10.1186/s40885-016-0042-0. eCollection 2015.
7
Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice.分析门诊电子处方中的医嘱。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):463-70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7786.
8
Analysis of National Drug Code Identifiers in Ambulatory E-Prescribing.分析门诊电子处方中的国家药品编码标识符。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Nov;21(11):1025-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.1025.
9
The HMO Research Network Virtual Data Warehouse: A Public Data Model to Support Collaboration.健康维护组织研究网络虚拟数据仓库:支持协作的公共数据模型。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Mar 24;2(1):1049. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1049. eCollection 2014.
10
Evaluation of a user guidance reminder to improve the quality of electronic prescription messages.评估一项用于提高电子处方信息质量的用户指导提醒措施。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Aug 6;5(3):699-707. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-03-CR-0022. eCollection 2014.