Suppr超能文献

氯沙坦、氨氯地平和赖诺普利三种抗高血压药物对高血压患者降压效果及耐受性的前瞻性随机研究。

Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Wu San-Chiang, Liu Chun-Peng, Chiang Hung-Ting, Lin Shoa-Lin

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Women and Children General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2004 Jan;19(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-003-0724-x.

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three different antihypertensive agents, losartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker), amlodipine (calcium channel blocker), and lisinopril (angiotensin-coverting enzyme inhibitor), in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 2-week washout period, 121 patients were randomly allocated to three different groups for 12 weeks. Medications were titrated upward as necessary to achieve the goal office-recorded sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) (defined as SiDBP <90 mmHg or SiDBP > or = 900 mmHg but with a > or = 10 mmHg drop from baseline). Efficacy and tolerability were assessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of therapy with each regimen. At 12 weeks, significant differences in SiDBP compared with data of baseline were noted in all three groups ( P < 0.001 in all comparisons). Similarly, significant differences in the sitting systolic blood pressure compared with baseline data were also seen for all three groups ( P < 0.001 in all comparisons). The number of patients reaching goal SiDBP were comparable for the three groups: 25 patients (62.5%) in the losartan group, 27 patients (67.5%) in the amlodipine group, and 22 patients (59.5%) in the lisinopril group (not significant). Amlodipine produced a more pronounced reduction in SiDBP than the other two medications, although without statistical significance. Patients receiving lisinopril showed a high incidence of coughing (31.7%). Low leg edema was noted only in the amlodipine group (7.5%). Compared with the amlodipine and lisinopril groups, the losartan group seemed to have relatively fewer episodes (7.5%), and fewer patients (three cases) experienced adverse effects. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that losartan has the same antihypertensive effect, but has superior tolerability compared with the other two drugs. Coughing was a common side effect of lisinopril therapy in our population.

摘要

我们前瞻性地评估了三种不同降压药物(氯沙坦,一种血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂;氨氯地平,一种钙通道阻滞剂;赖诺普利,一种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)对轻至中度高血压患者的降压效果和耐受性。经过 2 周的洗脱期后,121 名患者被随机分为三组,治疗 12 周。根据需要向上调整药物剂量,以达到目标诊室记录的坐位舒张压(SiDBP)(定义为 SiDBP <90 mmHg 或 SiDBP >或 = 90 mmHg 但较基线下降 >或 = 10 mmHg)。在每种治疗方案治疗 4、8 和 12 周后评估疗效和耐受性。在 12 周时,三组的 SiDBP 与基线数据相比均有显著差异(所有比较中 P < 0.001)。同样,三组的坐位收缩压与基线数据相比也有显著差异(所有比较中 P < 0.001)。达到目标 SiDBP 的患者数量在三组中相当:氯沙坦组 25 名患者(62.5%),氨氯地平组 27 名患者(67.5%),赖诺普利组 22 名患者(59.5%)(无显著差异)。氨氯地平使 SiDBP 的降低比其他两种药物更显著,尽管无统计学意义。接受赖诺普利治疗的患者咳嗽发生率较高(31.7%)。仅在氨氯地平组观察到下肢轻度水肿(7.5%)。与氨氯地平和赖诺普利组相比,氯沙坦组似乎发作次数相对较少(7.5%),且经历不良反应的患者较少(3 例)。总之,本研究表明氯沙坦具有相同的降压效果,但与其他两种药物相比耐受性更佳。咳嗽是我们研究人群中赖诺普利治疗的常见副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验