Chang Gung Medical Education Research Centre, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02392-y.
Active learning is defined as any instructional method that engages students in the learning process. Cultural differences in learning patterns can play an important role in engagement with active learning. We aimed to examine process models of active learning to understand what works, for whom and why.
Forty-eight sixth- and seventh-year medical students with experience of active learning methods were purposively selected to participate in ten group interviews. Interactions around active learning were analysed using a realist evaluation framework to unpack the 'context-mechanism-outcome' (CMO) configurations.
Three core CMO configurations, including cultural, training and individual domains, were identified. In the cultural context of a strong hierarchical culture, the mechanisms of fear prompted students to be silent (outcome) and dare not give their opinions. In the training context of teacher-student familiarity alongside teachers' guidance, the mechanisms of learning motivation, self-regulation and enthusiasm were triggered, prompting positive learning outcomes and competencies (outcome). In the individual context of learning how to learn actively at an early stage within the medical learning environment, the mechanisms of internalisation, professional identity and stress resulted in recognising active learning and advanced preparation (outcomes).
We identified three CMO configurations of Taiwanese medical students' active learning. The connections among hierarchical culture, fear, teachers' guidance, motivation, the medical environment and professional identity have been shown to affect the complex interactions of learning outcomes. Fear derived from a hierarchical culture is a concern as it is a significant and specific contextual factor, often sparking fear with negative outcomes.
主动学习被定义为任何能让学生参与学习过程的教学方法。学习模式的文化差异在主动学习的参与中起着重要作用。我们旨在检验主动学习的过程模型,以了解什么是有效的,为什么有效,对谁有效。
我们有目的地选择了 48 名具有主动学习方法经验的六年级和七年级医学生参加了十次小组访谈。使用真实评估框架分析围绕主动学习的互动,以解开“背景-机制-结果”(CMO)配置。
确定了三个核心 CMO 配置,包括文化、培训和个人领域。在强等级文化的文化背景下,恐惧机制促使学生保持沉默(结果),不敢发表意见。在师生熟悉和教师指导的培训背景下,学习动机、自我调节和热情的机制被触发,促进了积极的学习成果和能力(结果)。在个人背景下,在医学学习环境中尽早学会主动学习,内化、专业身份和压力的机制导致了对主动学习和提前准备的认识(结果)。
我们确定了台湾医学生主动学习的三个 CMO 配置。等级文化、恐惧、教师指导、动机、医学环境和专业身份之间的联系已被证明会影响学习成果的复杂相互作用。源于等级文化的恐惧是一个值得关注的问题,因为它是一个重要和特定的背景因素,往往会引发恐惧,产生负面结果。