Suppr超能文献

评估干血斑 C 反应蛋白法在类风湿关节炎患者疾病发作中的应用。

Assessment of a dried blood spot C-reactive protein method to identify disease flares in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

机构信息

Northern Ireland Centre for Stratified Medicine (NICSM), Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Altnagelvin Area Hospital, C-TRIC Building, Glenshane Road, Londonderry, BT47 6SB, UK.

Fusion Antibodies Plc., Springbank Road, Springbank Industrial Estate, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77826-0.

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterised by painful, stiff and swollen joints. RA features sporadic 'flares' or inflammatory episodes-mostly occurring outside clinics-where symptoms worsen and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) becomes elevated. Poor control of inflammation results in higher rates of irreversible joint damage, increased disability, and poorer quality of life. Flares need to be accurately identified and managed. A method comparison study was designed to assess agreement between CRP values obtained by dried blood spot (DBS) versus conventional venepuncture sampling. The ability of a weekly DBS sampling and CRP test regime to detect flare outside the clinic was also assessed. Matched venepuncture and finger lancet DBS samples were collected from n = 100 RA patients with active disease at baseline and 6 weeks (NCT02809547). A subset of n = 30 RA patients submitted weekly DBS samples over the study period. Patient demographics, including self-reported flares were recorded. DBS sample CRP measurements were made by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and venepuncture samples by a reference immunoturbometric assay. Data was compared between sample types by Bland-Altman and weighted Deming regression analyses. Flare detection sensitivity and specificity were compared between 'minimal' baseline and 6 week sample CRP data and the 'continuous' weekly CRP data. Baseline DBS ELISA assay CRP measures yielded a mean positive bias of 2.693 ± 8.640 (95% limits of agreement - 14.24 to 19.63%), when compared to reference assay data. Deming regression revealed good agreement between the DBS ELISA method and reference assay data, with baseline data slope of 0.978 and intercept -0.153. The specificity of 'continuous' area under the curve (AUC) CRP data (72.7%) to identify flares, was greater than 'minimal' AUC CRP data (54.5%). This study indicates reasonable agreement between DBS and the reference method, especially at low to mid-range CRP values. Importantly, longitudinal CRP measurement in RA patients helps to clearly identify flare and thus could assist in remote monitoring strategies and may facilitate timely therapeutic intervention.Trial registration: The Remote Arthritis Disease Activity MonitoR (RADAR) study was registered on 22/06/2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02809547. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02809547 .

摘要

类风湿关节炎(RA)的特征是关节疼痛、僵硬和肿胀。RA 表现为偶发性“发作”或炎症发作——大多数发生在诊所外——症状恶化,血浆 C 反应蛋白(CRP)升高。炎症控制不佳会导致更高的不可逆关节损伤、更高的残疾率和更差的生活质量。需要准确识别和管理发作。本研究设计了一项方法比较研究,以评估通过干血斑(DBS)与传统静脉穿刺取样获得的 CRP 值之间的一致性。还评估了每周 DBS 采样和 CRP 检测方案在诊所外检测发作的能力。从 n = 100 名基线和 6 周时疾病活动的 RA 患者采集匹配的静脉穿刺和指尖刺 DBS 样本(NCT02809547)。在研究期间,n = 30 名 RA 患者每周提交 DBS 样本。记录患者人口统计学资料,包括自述发作情况。DBS 样本 CRP 测量采用酶联免疫吸附测定法,静脉穿刺样本采用参考免疫比浊法。通过 Bland-Altman 和加权 Deming 回归分析比较两种样本类型之间的数据。比较“最小”基线和 6 周 CRP 数据与“连续”每周 CRP 数据之间的发作检测灵敏度和特异性。与参考测定数据相比,基线 DBS ELISA 测定 CRP 测量值的平均正偏差为 2.693 ± 8.640(95%置信区间-14.24 至 19.63%)。Deming 回归显示 DBS ELISA 方法与参考测定数据之间具有良好的一致性,基线数据斜率为 0.978,截距为-0.153。“连续”曲线下面积(AUC)CRP 数据(72.7%)识别发作的特异性大于“最小”AUC CRP 数据(54.5%)。本研究表明 DBS 与参考方法之间具有合理的一致性,尤其是在 CRP 值处于中低水平时。重要的是,RA 患者的纵向 CRP 测量有助于清楚地识别发作,从而有助于远程监测策略,并可能有助于及时的治疗干预。试验注册:远程关节炎疾病活动监测(RADAR)研究于 2016 年 6 月 22 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,标识符:NCT02809547。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02809547。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bc/7713120/cbeb82ff0de3/41598_2020_77826_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验